this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
712 points (99.4% liked)

politics

26282 readers
3100 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 327 points 1 day ago (5 children)

So, it's either healthcare subsidies or food? You can't have both? Even though we had both before Republicans took it all away, so they could give tax breaks to Trump's rich donors?

Fuck these assholes.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 199 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's also a bit of PR nightmare for the GOP. Trump defying the court order shifts the blame back onto them.

[–] FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world 109 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In a less polarized and post truth world you’d probably be right. I fear however that the solid 36-37% maga base will never find an issue that can’t be spun or rationalized. In the magasphere this situation seems to be framed as the GOP stepping up to fight against free health care for illegal immigrants which seems divorced from reality.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In a less polarized and post truth world you’d probably be right. I fear however that the solid 36-37% maga base will never find an issue that can’t be spun or rationalized.

It's not an accident...

When Nixon resigned, Roger Ailes wrote a memo that accidentally ended up in the icon presidential library:

The memo – called, simply enough, “A Plan For Putting the GOP on TV News” – is included in a 318-page cache of documents detailing [Roger] Ailes’ work for both the Nixon and George H.W. Bush administrations that we obtained from the Nixon and Bush presidential libraries. Through his firms REA Productions and Ailes Communications, Inc., Ailes served as paid consultant to both presidents in the 1970s and 1990s, offering detailed and shrewd advice ranging from what ties to wear to how to keep the pressure up on Saddam Hussein in the run-up to the first Gulf War.

The memo explains why television was the way to go:

Today television news is watched more often than people read newspapers, than people listen to the radio, than people read or gather any other form of communication. The reason: People are lazy. With television you just sit—watch—listen. The thinking is done for you.

https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2011/memo-from-1970-a-plan-for-putting-the-gop-on-tv-news/

They knew that if they owned the media, they could control what people thought, and no republican president would ever have to resign due to public outcry again.

Luckily, he was held back by federal regulations, until a good ole capitalist from Arkansas got elected and decided anyone should be able to own media in America:

The stated intention of the law was to "let anyone enter any communications business – to let any communications business compete in any market against any other."[5] In practice, it gave way to one of the largest consolidations of the telecommunications sector in history - as such, it is often described as an attempt to deregulate the American broadcasting and telecommunications markets due to technological convergence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996

After that it was gloves off and the billionaires gobbled up every aspect of the "news" industry and maintain almost exclusive control over what a majority of Americans hear.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

TBF, the problem with media was well underway before Clinton came along. The Fairness Doctrine being done away with under Ronnie Raygun opened the floodgates.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

Trump is posting on social media that Biden's administration was just giving SNAP benefits away. His idiot supporters are gonna believe it.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

I truly think that a good amount of these people could be personally executed by Trump shooting them in the chest, and while Trump says "I know what you are and I hate you" they would lay there dying and say "Oh it's okay, I know you didn't mean that. Everyone makes mistakes sometimes. I still support what you're doing overall." or possibly even "I guess I do deserve to die if you say so".

Now I will say the majority of even the maga team is not this nuts. But some definitely are. Many humans have unfortunately had the privilege to never interact with the kind of person who will truly never change their mind. I've known one or two, and it's a really mind-expanding experience, almost like you're meeting an extraterrestrial. It's hard for people who haven't seen them to believe 👽 lol

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think by saying he'll defy a court order, he's letting the supreme court know they have to okay whatever bullshit he comes up with. Otherwise, it will become obvious that they can't do jack shit.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Was the order even appealed or did he just tell them to pound sand?

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

No idea. They always take their time, delay, and appeal so I just assume that'll be the eventual resolution.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

it was always on them, but more never hurts.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the government can't afford to feed and heal the people, they shouldn't be building a ballroom. I was taught in school to pay for your needs before your wants.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

But the ballroom is all being paid for by the people who are hoping Trump will do them favors. So, that makes it none of our business.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the end it's going to be neither. Because once you give way on one front, it is proven that you'll negotiate.

This is literally how we got here. Dems capitulated over and over during Obama's presidency to keep programs like SNAP going, and Republicans have run the same strategy ever since. Stonewall everything as long as you can, and blame it on the other side the entire time. And people eat it up every single time.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I feel like dems should add to their list of demands- if the Rs dont agree to reverse course on Healthcare now, dems will not agree to reopen until all missed snap benefits are paid back retroactively- if it goes another week, they will not vote until ice is fully refunded, etc

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Be thankful you get a choice.

We didn’t get a choice about bailing out Argentina. Or soybean sales to China.