this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
248 points (100.0% liked)

News

33058 readers
4188 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

So what law are these stores violating? How are they going to detect and enforce that, if there is in fact a law that exists that actually says this (and again, I don’t believe there is)?

Edit: yeah should have read the article, the answer is in there

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Did you read the article?

At issue is SNAP’s “Equal Treatment Rule,” which bars stores from either discriminating against people in the program or offering them favorable treatment.

I dug a little further. The SNAP “Equal Treatment Rule” is not a standalone statute passed by Congress, it’s an agency regulation issued by USDA under its authority to administer the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. It is codified in federal regulations (7 C.F.R. Part 274). SNAP itself is authorized by the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. §§ 2011–2036). That law gives USDA broad authority to regulate how benefits are issued and used.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Oh, the regulatory authority of the agency that has no budget? The one that isn't supposed to be working because the government is shut down? The one that can't do its job because the Republicans won't let it? That's the one that's mysteriously somehow going to enforce its regulations the opposite of how they were intended, to harm the public instead of helping it?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago

Laws don't instantly become moot just because there isn't a police officer standing right in front of you with handcuffs ready to go, and it's not a good idea to normalize having agencies deciding on an ad-hoc basis "we're just going to let our rules slide this time." What if the EPA did that for polluters?

I am in no way supporting this, I'm just pointing out that the problem isn't as easy or obvious to solve as it seems. They need to change the regulations and there's a process for that. They should have seen something like this coming and had the regulations account for it to begin with, but they didn't and now we're here. Oversights like that happen sometimes.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

At issue is SNAP’s “Equal Treatment Rule,” which bars stores from either discriminating against people in the program or offering them favorable treatment.

It’s in the article. I’ll leave the googling of the equal Treatment Rule up to you.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Fair point. I did not read the article before responding, so that is on me.

At the same time, if people are in the program, but are not getting the benefits of the program… are they in the program?