this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
473 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

76569 readers
2500 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's more about the batteries than the motor. You can make a motor that sucks down as much power as you want. The battery can't necessarily provide that without damage.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Hopefully solid-state batteries (once their production manages to ramp up to consumer vehicle scale) could allow for higher capacity and power delivery without the limitations or safety risks of current battery tech.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, I guess. Power output isn't what I'm really hoping for on new battery tech. What we have is perfectly capable of 0-60 times that only thoroughbred performance street cars can meet (like Ariel Atom territory), and the top speed is plenty.

Once you're putting down 500hp, tires start to become a limiting factor. The torque that goes behind that number can stress the limit on all but the largest tires with the stickiest compounds.

Safety, range, and weight reduction of new battery tech are great, though.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Yep, I have an EV and the way my partner drove it just eats through tires. We're talking about $1.5k, 50k mile warranty tires being replaced at 20-25k because someone liked to pretend they're a fucking astronaut on launch day.

Not bitter.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So you get another set under the warranty? Maybe even twice?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I wish! The tire shop said that the last set was damaged by excessive acceleration, so they wouldn't honor the warranty. I can't argue - our EV has over 600 horsepower and almost 900 lb-ft of torque, so my partner is just destroying those poor tires.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago

Oof, I’d question how they could even determine that beyond “shouldn’t have worn that fast” but I suppose they know what they’re doing…

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago

I also have an EV and tires need changing way faster, for sure. The original tires were replaced only after 2 years, but I just love taking off on that animal, so, I'll be wasting more money on tires.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Current capacity, safety and power delivery are fine for most purposes, really.

LFP batteries really solved battery fires - they can't produce their own oxygen like older NMC batteries, so they just get really hot and die instead of going off like fireworks.

Once you get past 300 miles, you're pushing the limits of the average bladder and you need to stop before the car does.

With current electric trucks, if you're doing some city driving and plug the truck in when you take a break, a truck driver will run out of hours before the truck runs out of range.