this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
914 points (99.6% liked)

People Twitter

8443 readers
2502 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Una@europe.pub 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah apps are known to be 100% reliable and without bugs.

Tap for spoiler/sarcasm

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I bet it just checks the colour of people's skins.

[–] Una@europe.pub 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Either that or it has database of who is US citizen or who is here on VISA or something, and if not it deports but it has many points of failure like your ID photo or whatever photo can be bald, but you in the meantime grew hair a little and here it can possibly think you are different person. Especially considering app being "definitive determination" according to screenshot and it overrides birth certificate, like I could see possibility someone getting falsely accused (hopefully not) because they changed their appearance a bit idk.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 1 day ago

There's already stories of US citizens being detained despite having valid ID on them. There's financial incentives for them to bring in as many people as possible and they don't care if they get it wrong.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

They don't deserve the benefit of the doubt. Facial recognition has already resulted in false arrests, damage to people's homes, vehicles, livelyhood etc by normal police. ICE has even less supervision and is known to willingly hire people with violent crime records.

I'll say it again: If they remotely deserved the benefit of the doubt, we wouldn't be looking at the reality we currently inhabit.