this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
4 points (83.3% liked)

Linux

6774 readers
72 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How much ewaste has Microsoft caused just by wanting to sell more copies of the next version of windows.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not about sales, 11 is a free upgrade.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

On a machine that can run it. If you have one of the machines that are the subject of this article, the only upgrade path is to buy a new one, for which Microsoft takes a healthy OEM fee for including Win11. You can easily see that cost on devices like the Legion Go S that cost significantly less for the SteamOS version.

[–] b_van_b@programming.dev -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Windows 10 was released ten years ago. How long do you think they should provide support? For comparison, Redhat gives 10 years for LTS releases, and Ubuntu and Linux Mint give 5 years. Extended support beyond the LTS period requires a paid subscription, similar to Windows.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

Every OS just mentioned can be updated, no support needed? Just overlay the next kernel over the last and all these distros provide a pathway for that.

Moreover, Arch, Void, Gentoo etc are rolling, so no loss of support.

I figure a multi-million dollar company could do the equivalent of exactly that.