this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
157 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

75499 readers
2832 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes, sure, it's the same Intel that is prioritizing immediate money returns over long term gains, right?

Nvidia definitely didn't do this investment to kill a new competitor. They just happen to find too many billion dollars in their bank account and didn't know what to do with that and thought "you know what? Let's invest them in a competitor to spice up the market"

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

It's to try and stage off AMD who has cornered the other half of the data center. Nvidia just had the come up on GPUs in DC's, but lost a decade to trying to compete with AMD there. Now AMD has the most sought after high density chips and FPGA platform with no competition. Nvidia thinks this will slow AMDs sales there I'm sure.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 week ago

Actual headline: "Intel says what they were told to say to avoid antitrust after US government pushes AI agenda and gains ownership in Intel."

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 week ago

Like your MSN avatar