this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Ask Lemmy

29717 readers
1326 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I fled Reddit due to the authoritarian mod craziness, but Lemmy.world seems infested with too much Communist craziness. I'm leftist, but communism is idiocy. Is there an instance that leans more democratic socialist but refrains from going off the deep end?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually Existing Socialism. Cuba, the PRC, Vietnam, Laos, the former USSR, etc.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why aren't the Haudenosaunee on that list? Isn't that a bit racist?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tribal societies that don't have advanced industrialization have a separate Mode of Production from "Socialism" in the Marxian sense. No racism at all.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but on the other hand, socialism is when the people own the means of production, and the Haudenosaunee have/had way more of that than USSR and China.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I disagree, tribal societies could only have that kind of relation by virtue of being small. In the age of modern industry, this is no longer feasible while maintaining large-scale manufacturing.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And your source is you made it the fuck up?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't really know what you mean, here. Do you think we can use the same methods of small, communal tribes as organization with mass manufacturing and complex supply chains? I would argue that society changed the methods of organization to better fit the level of technological process, and not out of any individual will.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're parroting some racist ass noble savage bullshit right now. Tribal societies weren't communist because they were too dumb to create advanced societies. They were communist because they were smart enough to pick the most efficient economic system in the harshest conditions. It wasn't an accident, it was the result of millennia of hard work and careful thought. This work is universally applicable. You just don't want to listen to brown people telling you how to run an economy.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, that's not my point. My point is that at the level of technological development of tribal societies, they correctly picked the most efficient organizational structures for their conditions. They were not uniquely gifted nor uniquely dumb, but real humans with human organization. Societies like the Aztecs began a form of production similar to Feudalism when that became more efficient, and it is likely that when they discovered technologies like steam engines they would have transitioned towards a form of society similar to Capitalism.

Humans organize in manners most efficient for their conditions, it isn't about who discovers the best form of society but which form of society best suits the conditions of the land and level of productive forces.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Humans organize in manners most efficient for their conditions

That's ridiculous. Communism is way more efficient for our current level of development than capitalism, yet we're doing capitalism. I don't want to hear you argue capitalism is most efficient in the 21st century, it's not. We've got homelessness, poverty, climate change, genocide, planned obsolescence.... Capitalism stinks. Quit defending it.