this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
82 points (100.0% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

1286 readers
1074 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I guess be careful with Reddit now, because I haven't up voted anything celebrating anyone's harm or death. I've only upvoted things that bring awareness to how awful certain people are or things in this subreddit. Absolutely wild.


Originally Posted By u/KnobbyDarkling At 2025-09-16 07:29:50 AM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] CubitOom@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is it actually rare? I think the majority of licensed/private digital services are mostly hostile compared to Free Open Source alternatives. By default, most of these services surveil all users and sell the data to brokers, with always online practices, constantly getting telemetry and other metrics from users. Some of these services even install kernel level root kits of various kinds under the pretext of security or anti-cheat. All of which I consider a form of hostility.

Honestly, I think this is the norm. There is a spectrum of hostility that consumers are just either ignoring or are unaware of. And even with the worst offenders, people find excuses to continue to use them.

[โ€“] taco@anarchist.nexus 4 points 23 hours ago

Most other services are passively exploitative like you're describing. I can at least see an argument for that being a trade-off: using a "free" service in exchange for profiting from your data.

reddit does this too, but on top of that is also actively threatening to ban users for voting. That's just using the platform as intended.

As you noted, most of these services are hostile in ways that go unnoticed by the userbase. This is markedly more hostile than that, which is I think the point of the comment above. In an internet of services that are shitty toward users, reddit's a bit extra shitty toward theirs.