this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
82 points (100.0% liked)
/r/50501 Mirror
1286 readers
1074 users here now
Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is it actually rare? I think the majority of licensed/private digital services are mostly hostile compared to Free Open Source alternatives. By default, most of these services surveil all users and sell the data to brokers, with always online practices, constantly getting telemetry and other metrics from users. Some of these services even install kernel level root kits of various kinds under the pretext of security or anti-cheat. All of which I consider a form of hostility.
Honestly, I think this is the norm. There is a spectrum of hostility that consumers are just either ignoring or are unaware of. And even with the worst offenders, people find excuses to continue to use them.
Most other services are passively exploitative like you're describing. I can at least see an argument for that being a trade-off: using a "free" service in exchange for profiting from your data.
reddit does this too, but on top of that is also actively threatening to ban users for voting. That's just using the platform as intended.
As you noted, most of these services are hostile in ways that go unnoticed by the userbase. This is markedly more hostile than that, which is I think the point of the comment above. In an internet of services that are shitty toward users, reddit's a bit extra shitty toward theirs.