this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
119 points (94.1% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

1286 readers
1240 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media


Originally Posted By u/LadyMadonna_x6 At 2025-09-14 03:58:27 AM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

While I don't have any time for him, and the world is a better place without him, the point of those screencaps is the claim that some portion of the (US) population had a totally sanitised view of him, that didn't include all the reasons we detest him.

Their point is that "The few bits of him that people heard about were plenty enough to know exactly what kind of a person he was." isn't true (supposedly, I'm skeptical). Supposedly there is a group of people in a bubble that only saw Kirk preaching kindness and light and none of the awful stuff.

Sounds hard for me to believe but that's the claim (which you aren't addressing).

Many rightwing Christians live in a sanitized bubble on social media so they won't see the racist content from Kirk because they avoid other "edgy" content so the algorithms do not supply this content.