this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
498 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

74966 readers
3887 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Another option is to allow otherwise-valid signatures after expiration. It's generally still possible to check them.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That completely nullifies the entire point of signature validations.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How? Expiration doesn't grant an unauthorized party access to the private key.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's zero cryptographic reason to have a signed date at that point.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Which nullifies the point of certificates having an expiration date (limited window for exploiting a compromised certificate, possibility of domains changing hands), not the point of validating the signature (tie responsibility for apps to who owned a domain on a specific date, allow third parties to create blacklists of bad developers).