this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
176 points (98.4% liked)

News

32233 readers
3427 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The other comment already pointed this out better, but yeah tor and i2p as a concept use onion routing which if you utilize correctly, won't de-anonymize you if a government runs exit nodes, since they won't know where that traffic is originating from*

*big disclaimer is that you must ensure your tor/i2p traffic itself is clear of identification. There'd be no purpose in logging into your personal gmail since anyone with access to that info could easily identify that its you. Lots of people have been caught simply because they performed bad opsec and did not separate their clearnet and darknet activities (ex: Ross Ulbricht advertised his silk road with his regular old gmail on a forum with his real name).

The systemic threat to Tor and i2p is if a government is able to influence the routing algorithm or create enough tor nodes that the routing guarantees a path through controlled nodes where traffic can be de-anonymized via logistical analysis (Sybil attack). This is significantly harder to accomplish but not impossible. Tor particularly has been hit with recent attacks that successfully de-anonymized hidden servers by poisoning the route algorithm. Even though Tor nodes are decentralized, the routing map is not (controlled by a handful of route authorized servers) which was done to protect against the Sybil attack specifically by dropping known bad nodes, though it has become controversial since it clearly didn't protect against certain attacks.

i2p is theory is supposed to be better due to its complete decentralized nature and advanced garlic routing, but successful attacks have been demonstrated in a lab environment.

Still, both darknets become stronger just by having more users to mix all the traffic and make it more difficult to de-anonymize

The other annoying issue which i2p actually does solve quite well compared to Tor is speed. Darknets are notoriously slow due to their hefty routing to ensure anonymity. i2p improves this with its garlic routing, but its still feels like you're running on a congested DSL line from 1999.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 week ago

For anyone curious and willing to try a safe website - lemmy.cafe is also served on tor.

https://lemmy.cafe/post/22287795