this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

30781 readers
2368 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal appeals court has tossed an Amarillo woman's death sentence after it found that local prosecutors had failed to reveal that their primary trial witness was a paid informant.

With a 2-1 decision, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals last week sent Brittany Marlowe Holberg's 1998 murder conviction back down to the trial court to decide how to proceed.

Holberg has been on death row for 27 years. In securing her conviction in 1998, Randall County prosecutors heavily relied on testimony from a jail inmate who was working as a confidential informant for the City of Amarillo police. That informant recanted her testimony in 2011, but neither a Texas Court of Criminal Appeals or a federal district court found that prosecutors had violated Holberg's constitutional right to a fair trial.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SculptusPoe@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is why the death penalty or even prison sentences longer than a decade should be eliminated...

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't agree that they should be eliminated. They're there for a reason.

The problem is the unreasonable system we have in place. There had been stories of evidence provided to the judge that simply got ignored that would've proven innocence and the prisoner got killed still. That isn't the flaw with the penalty, it's a flaw with the poor decision making of the judges and everyone involved in the system.

I don't understand what about that people don't get when they advocate against death penalties. Advocate for a better and thorough justice system.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There is no reason for the death penalty. It does not serve justice. It does not act as a deterrent. It does not save cost.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There is no reason to also keep wasting taxpayer dollars keeping murderers and worst criminals alive. People like you seem to be happy in doing that and actually believe they can be reformed. When, the large majority seems to disagree with you. You don't have and never have had a solution to this. So what makes you think you've got a stance to abolish death penalties?

All that your kind seems to do is just waste people's time with your runaround logic. It's tiresome.

No, I'm done, I'm not going to hear more replies from people who I've exampled. There's a reason things exist and you don't want to accept that, fine, whatever. But you keep running around your own circular logic for all I care.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

You think true justice isn't worth working toward? Better to kill people just to be safe, and if a few innocent people are murdered, well, it's a small price to pay, right?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wrongful_convictions_in_the_United_States

Here's a long list of reasons that you're wrong.