this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
866 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

74676 readers
2502 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That works in the city but i live in a remote area, and have an hour and a half round trip to work every day because its not economically viable for me to move closer.

Since I doubt Canada/BC will spend the money putting in viable public transit/high speed rail, I just want them to do the bare minimum to allow me to afford to stop burning gas to afford my next meal.

While striving for turning every small town into a walkable city sounds great and amazing on paper, the reality is it won't happen, so we should push for baby steps in the right direction instead only focusing on the absolute ideal.

[–] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Us as well. I am disabled. One hour drive one way to the hospital. Grocery store is half an hour. A train would be awesome but they keep ripping up tracks here so that's not likely.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

stuff like this is why I want to focus on the wide, sweeping generalization of "smaller vehicle is better"

there's no need for someone in your position to drive a massive crossover for your commute in case you need to pick up 30 lb of groceries after work. you can do that with a hatchback, and pretty much the biggest reason that people don't choose to do it with a hatchback is that they're afraid of the bigger heavier vehicles on the road

I still push bicycle infrastructure, but I'm not going to push for everybody to get on bikes. I'm going to push for everybody to stop having such goddamn offensive dangerous vehicles (yes please drive at me at 90 km/h with blinding headlights in a 4,000 lb vehicle with a hood that is above my eye level when I'm in a vehicle with 8 in of ground clearance), and try to get them to realize that no it's not okay because it came that way, you bought it and you have a responsibility as the owner and driver

[–] DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And I don't drive a large crossover, I drive an escape phev, carpool with 2 other people, and use it for more than just '30 pounds of groceries'.

I have filled it to the brim and gone camping multiple times this year, use it to transport my recycling to the transfer station every couple months, and at least twice a year do a large grocery shop at the Costco 4 hours away, stuffing it as full as I can manage.

I regularly use it to transport things that wouldn't fit in a vehicle smaller than this one. Hell, I managed to stuff my stove in the thing, though only just barely.

For my daily commute, since I charge it both at home and at work, I only burn 3-4L of gas, which I would say is quite good for nearly 150km.

The only way for my daily/weekly/monthly/yearly routine to be more eco friendly is if I could afford to trade it in for a full electric vehicle - and with the trips I do on a regular basis (including camping, day trips to the 'nearby' lakes, occasional work driving), I would need something with a range above 600km, preferably 700km to be safe in the winter. Otherwise I would have to maintain 2 vehicles - one an electric with a range of at least 200km and the other a small truck or mid sized SUV, and that kind of defeats the entire purpose.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

right, like you're using your vehicle appropriately for its capabilities. people seem to think that they need to use it at 10% of its capabilities

[–] DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

10%? Try 1%... For every 1 of me in this area there are literally 10 lifted king cab shortboxes that never get used for truck purposes on the highway for the same commute as me.

The excuse is always "but I need it if I go offroad or want to tow my boat/camper to the lake!" as if they do that more than once a year.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're saying "this solution won't work for me so nobody should have it". Try instead "good that it works for you, but I need XYZ so we can tackle the problem on both fronts."

[–] DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's... Not at all what I am saying.

Go read the rest of the thread, where I agree the ideal is great, but we should be taking realistic steps towards it, instead of an unrealistic, all or nothing attitude that doesn't take rural Canadians into consideration.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

I misunderstood you then. We seem to be of the same opinion.