this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
663 points (98.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

34161 readers
3457 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] socsa@piefed.social 82 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Hey I studied this in grad school for a bit, and it really is just "someone does some dumb shit which leads to a cascading wave of additional people doing dumb shit which propagates backwards for miles." Basically when the offered load is getting close to the maximum load, all it takes is one person aggressively changing lanes to throw that section of highway into gridlock, and it will remain that way until the total integrated traffic flux across that incident boundary again falls below the critical offered load inflection point.

Basically, pick a lane and just stay in it. Maintain proper following distance. Counterintuitively, the following distance should be for the speed you want to drive, so even in traffic it should be like 5+ car lengths even though you are going slow. This is because it reduces the offered load, and once that number falls below the critical point, speeds will increase again. Bumper to bumper traffic basically prevents that from happening because it dampens the ability for a "speedup" wave to propagate.

Of course this is all impossible for humans. All it takes is a few idiots to throw off the balance.

[–] Takios@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 1 day ago

so even in traffic it should be like 5+ car lengths even though you are going slow.

Other drivers: "It's free real estate"

[–] LemmyZed@lemmy.ca 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So basically: 1. Put people in public transport away from the steering wheel, 2) scale back cars use.

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yep! All it takes is one person braking, and then the person behind braking, then the person behind them, and eith each braking the overall speed slows down more and more. It creates a wave of traffic. The wave passes through. The starting point I think moves back further and further.

I think about it a lot while I sit in traffic.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world -3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think the issue is more or less slow drivers. One asshole is going 60 in a 70 in the left lane which caused people to pass them which in turn cause the cascade from the maneuvering around the slow person.

Slow drivers are far more dangerous than people don't 10 15 over the speed limit.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You are incorrect. You are the cause of the traffic jam lol, literally.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Why is Driving Slower than Other Vehicles Just as Dangerous as Speeding? https://share.google/U82ugU39Gc0XOa55G

A Few Slow Drivers Increase the Number of Accidents https://share.google/SUYjn8eEkNNLe5xBO

Slow Drivers: Dangers of Driving Slow | Allstate https://share.google/7GP2waFViHMUqEJYj

Some times you people don't even know what you're downvoting.

[–] N0t_Legal_Advice@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago

There was a really interesting MythBusters episode where they essentially replicate what you're talking about. Albeit with an "n" of 1 or 2 and a very small scale, but still interesting.

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

Sad thing is its more than just a few idiots.

The idiots are the majority. So stupidly self absorbed they constantly screw themselves over trying to "get theirs".

[–] ftbd@feddit.org -5 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

"Pick a lane and stay in it" leads to slow drivers blocking the left lane, no?

[–] seralth@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You have demonstrated why fundamentally humans suck at driving and this problem is unsolvable.

Not because you asked the question but because it's not intuitive why.

So long as this has to be explained to anyone it can't be solved.

[–] ftbd@feddit.org 1 points 13 hours ago

I'm genuinely curious: are there adverse effects to an arrangement where the right lane is used by large trucks going 90-100 kph, middle lanes used for normal traffic going 120-130 kph and the left lane kept open for faster traffic? As far as I understand, these issues arise when cars go back and forth between lanes all the time, or when cars go slower than the ones behind them without an open lane to overtake them. If you pick a lane and stay in it, you might cause the second issue

[–] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

From a purely traffic load perspective, the whole "fast lane" thing doesn't make a huge difference, and the aggressive obsession with it is actually a big part of the psychology which creates traffic in the first place. Traffic capacity is generally optimized when everyone is traveling close to the same speed and has enough following distance to safely maintain that speed, which is why speed limits are set for the slowest road users. Just in general, speed does not increase road capacity beyond a certain fairly low limit because it requires dramatically increased following distance, or in the absence of such responsible behavior, it massively increases the frequency of traffic disruption.

The worst case is a few people traveling much faster than the slowest road users, as these few users both take up more space, and cause more disruption. The "fast lane" concept is rooted firmly in an unfortunate behavioral reality and has basically no real scientific basis beyond that. Even if you had perfect robot drivers with perfect reaction time and the ability to see far ahead of themselves, the critical capacity speed only increases slightly because the maximum stoping distance is still limited by rubber and asphalt.

[–] BJ_and_the_bear@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I’m a little confused about the mechanism of the speeders causing the disruption. Is it because when they cut in front of someone closely, it causes the driver to hit the brakes to make more room, thus triggering the chain reaction?

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Thats a big part of it, yeah. Theres lots of really good comments about it in this thread.