this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
609 points (99.7% liked)

News

32220 readers
3232 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A grand jury declined for a third time to indict a D.C. woman accused of assaulting an FBI agent during an inmate swap with ICE – a rare loss for federal prosecutors that could foreshadow further trouble if the case goes to trial.

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office said in a filing Monday it would move ahead with charging Sidney Lori Reid with a misdemeanor for the alleged assault outside the D.C. Jail in July. A magistrate judge had given prosecutors until Monday afternoon to secure an indictment against Reid or see the felony version of the assault charge dismissed.

A grand jury declining to indict three times on the same case is a warning the evidence may not stand up at trial, according to attorney Christopher Macchiaroli, a partner at Silverman Thompson Slutkin White who previously served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the federal prosecutor’s office in D.C.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is Jury nullification in play here too?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Jury nullification is when a case goes to trial and the jury gives a not guilty verdict even though everyone agrees the person did in fact do the crime.

A grand jury declining to indict means somebody is attempting to press charges but the jury isn't willing to try them even before the trial begins, being an indicator that the prosecution might not have enough evidence worth wasting a judge and jury's time.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is what happens when the boss is a hack propagandist whose half-drunk all the time, making decisions with the same logic that she demands justice on TV, for outrage and ratings.

Come to find out, real court doesn't work like the Neilson ratings, and you actually have to have an actual case, if you want to put an actual human being in actual prison for actual years.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Careful with that talk, pal, some people might take offense to having any faith in the complex system in these parts.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Grand juries can also be nullified. If the grand jury believes nobody should be charged for the crime they can claim the evidence is insufficient.

But like with regular juries, you didn't nullify, you just didn't buy the government's story