this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
151 points (98.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34274 readers
1358 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Zendaya just plays an immature, "rebel without a cause" New Yorker instead of Chani, a strong and intelligent Fremen young lady who falls in love with and follows her Muad'dib, not just because of his prophetic abilities but also/mostly because of his character. But, in the current Western cultural understanding, that just wouldn't fly as strong means selfish and reactive and intelligent means rebellious and lippy. She's awed by Paul, as would be anyone surrounding him (to Paul's chagrin when it changes those around him to more "robotic" beings as it does with Stilgar), but also understands him deeply and is his emotional pillar, while Paul's the pillar to his entire community. They just wanted a "girl boss" and that's what we had in Denis' Dunes. πŸ˜”

[–] sleep_deprived@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I get where you're coming from, and I do feel like Chani really suffered from the adaptation, but I felt like it was more due to screentime and not having internal thoughts than changes made. I felt her being skeptical at the beginning was both a great change to her character (it feels like she falls in love with the Muad'dib Paul becomes, not the Atreides he was) and a really good way to carry themes of anti-messianism into the movie where the book relied on philosophical asides. It also provides a natural foil to Stilgar's zeal and Jessica's manipulation, presenting Chani as more aligned with Paul himself.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It was unnecessary and disruptive (and what was that "Chani is a leader of an internal rebellion in the Fremen" all about in Dune Part 2?!), Chani served her purpose in Dune like pretty much other characters did besides the protagonists Paul and Leto II, who simply take more of the stage because, as prophetic beings infused with semi-omniscient knowledge, have more depth to them. The rest are mostly just people, and we all know people, but Dune was never about the characters... and maybe that's why it cannot be adapted for the masses. I mean, even events like a jihad that kills billions and the death of Paul's first child (was this even in the movie?! But sludge covered Baron Harkonnen was front and center, lol, without even mentioning his pedophilia!) are just brushed off, written in some sentences tops. The meat and potatoes of Dune are the philosophical explorations, in particular "how would anyone handle excess knowledge?", and as such Chani played her role as much as Leto and Jessica did, you change the characters and you just muddle something clear. I didn't even mind when they genderswapped Paul's short-lived mentor in Arrakis, cause it really doesn't matter much, but they replaced Chani with just Zendaya. They also put way more action scenes in it but didn't show the very important dinner scene, didn't properly explain why it was important to have a "male Bene Gesserit" (again, modern sensibilities), didn't properly explain Paul's visions and left it very inconsistent/inconclusive, but these long (beautiful, certainly) shots with empty silences were there, because that's what matters in fricking DUNE...

For those who don't care about the depth of Dune and the points Herbert tried to make, the movies are lovely. And for the ones who do, we'll always have the books, so whatever, I guess. But I got my COVID shots quickly just to watch Dune Part One and I'm still a little bit salty, lol, that's all.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Calling Zendaya’s Chani a girl boss New Yorker seems incredibly misogynistic to me.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't understand what "woman hating subtext" you read from my comment but, if you read the books, it will just seem appropriate.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’ve read all of them after Foundation it’s my favorite science fiction series.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You're feigning ignorance then if you actually recall the books. Zendaya's/Denis' Chani and Herbert's Chani are like night and day. And, again, what exactly was 'misogynistic' about my comment? And do I have to start copypasting passages of Dune and Messiah and make a comparative analysis with Denis' Dune? It's past midnight over here, my guy.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be completely honest, Herbert's Chani was pretty forgettable. Admittedly, it's been a very long time since I've read anything Dune, but I truly cannot remember anything memorable about Chani in the books...

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

She's Paul's everything (and trying to keep her alive for as long as possible is the main reason he does anything in Messiah, basically) and mostly a supporting character in the books, and there's nothing wrong with that... but Zendaya is a star and the West would've crucified Denis if he just let Chani be Chani. We both know it, that's the core of the disagreement in this comment section, lol. Heretics and Chapterhouse have fantastic female protagonists, but I doubt we'll get there, sadly.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

She's Paul's everything

Literally her only trait that I can remember.

If I'm understanding you correctly, you're upset that he improved Chani? Or do you just prefer 1 dimensional women characters who are defined entirely by their man?

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's not an improvement, not at all. Chani in the books is someone I can picture becoming the muse and pillar of a complex man burdened with knowledge and duty (which is narratively necessary in both Dune and Messiah!). Lippy, immature, irrationally rebellious and feisty Zendaya's Chani is not that. Again, many books, including Herbert's own later in the series, have female protagonists who are not "1 dimensional" (although none as shallow and silly as the girl boss Chani of Denis, who certainly isn't 1 dimensional, lol πŸ™„) and are fantastic. And upset is a big word, more like "disappointed and dissatisfied", but money follows audiences so I understand. 🀷

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like yappy, but with a disrespectful attitude for no reason. πŸ˜…

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm familiar with the word... I just think it betrays a bit of misogyny. Probably not even consciously.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, it was certainly deliberate (and a little cheeky), but without any generalized hatred. Zendaya's Chani just happens to exhibit it and, as such, she cannot realistically be the idealised extremely mature, softly feminine (but realistic and pragmatic because she's a Fremen still) and self-sacrificial teenager both Muad'dib (another teenager but a princeling infused with excess, inhuman knowledge) and the story need for it to make sense. Paul needs someone of his caliber, but a yin to his yang, and OG Chani is exactly that. The sexes are different and our shortcomings come in different shades: needlessly argumentative and difficult "lippy" is to women what arrogant "mansplaining" or physical and erratical "brutish" is to men, for example. 🀷

[–] littleomid@feddit.org 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is this β€œthe west” here in the room with us?

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Unless Lemmings suddenly became majority Pakistani/Maori/Persian/Nigerian/Dagestani/Indonesian/Algerian/etc., ofc! πŸ˜…

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Honestly it feels like you dislike the actor and are projecting it on to the character.

You're the king/queen of avoidance.