this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

17268 readers
394 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

In all seriousness, human elderlies are actually evolutionary anomaly, because if Darwinian tenet of "survival of the fittest" applies 100% of the time, they would not be the norm. But the fact that old people are prevalent in human society is the proof that we are compassionate and loving creatures that transcend cold evolutionary programming. We care for others and the vulnerable.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

There are other species which have elderly members, namely whales and elephants.

It’s postulated that having grandmothers helps in a species where young take a long time to mature.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

Sure, in the context of physical abilities.

However, i think bands of hominids who care for each other have a survival advantage. I guess thats who we've evolved to be social creatures.

Also,, nanna might not be able to hunt mammoths anymore, but she knows what to do in years when the mammoth dont come.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 0 points 2 months ago

I posted this further down but you would enjoy it if you haven't seen it already. The end of the video supports your statement. Why Your Grandmother Is an Evolutionary Mystery

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

darwinian selection has nothing to do with aging. that's religious right / 1920s robber baron bullshit.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Actually having elders in human societies is shown to positively correlate with better outcomes for the youth in that society. Grandmothers in particular have a measurable benefit.

https://elifesciences.org/articles/92914

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-93652-4

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah. One idea is that, since our offspring take SO long to mature and take so many resources relative to other animals, that it makes more sense at some point for mothers to devote their resources to existing children rather than focus on trying to have more. So it benefits us as a species to have "support" people like grandmas in our society. This is getting into a tangent but there are all sorts of things that kinda "make sense" if you think about life before modern society. Homosexual men would have probably been an evolutionary advantage to a clan of early humans since it would have provided extra strong male bodies without adding to mating pressure. People with a preference for staying up at night and sleeping during the day could have provided more alert guards to watch for predators. Etc etc.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] kieron115@startrek.website 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Some of our greatest minds are ADHD, probably bc ADHD brains seem to approach problems in generally more innovative/non-traditional ways than neurotypicals. It can also foster intense motivation in people. Bill Gates, for example, has been open about his struggles with ADHD. Many scholars believe that Albert Einstein struggled with AuDHD (ADHD with autism, which wasn't in the American DSM until fairly recently).

https://www.thebrainworkshop.com/blog/successful-people-with-adhd/

https://www.additudemag.com/slideshows/famous-people-with-adhd/

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Ohh, add this recent episode of Radiolab to the list.

https://radiolab.org/podcast/the-menopause-mystery

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Except that it isn't a religious thing. I don't know if it was natural selection or societal pressure causing artificial selection, but human's are something of an evolutionary anomaly in the sense that the only other animals on earth who go through menopause are a few species of whales. There's a whole evolutionary theory tied to it called the grandmother hypothesis. Or you can watch this PBS video about it if you don't feel like reading. It's pretty interesting really.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago

And how many successful actually productive and generous persons alive wore glasses? Yep, you entered another mind trap.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Almost all of it comes down to how long it takes to raise children. It takes a lot more people and effort and time to raise humans vs any other species, and its made us unique in that we have essentially support roles. Elderly people, people who can't or dont want to have kids of their own, even older children, all have a role to play in making sure we make it to adulthood and continue the species.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 months ago

The "grandmother theory" is supporting this idea.

The idea is that past a certain age there is an evolutionary benefit to not be able to have kids anymore. Past a certain age, to pass our genes it's more beneficial to be able to help descendants with their kids rather than having kids on our own.

[–] Patches@ttrpg.network 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Does anyone currently have any elders taking care of their kids? Or having done so?

The current generation of Elders living today aren't doing shit for support.

I would argue given how much voting power they have - they are actively making it worse for ~~parents~~ everyone

[–] Djehngo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's becoming more common where I am for a couple to move back to somewhere near one of their sets of parents before they have kids so they can rely on them for occasional childcare since both of the new parents usually have jobs

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

The grandparents have jobs as well here in uk so nobody has families anymore..

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 0 points 2 months ago

I think it's less common in northern america than in other continents.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 months ago

Yes, my mother in law is living with us and helping is to take care of our 4 years old and 2 years old