The framing I used is me trying to summarize in simplified terms for folks who aren't particularly legally savvy. In the USA minors have a more limited set of rights than adults (medical agency is a really solid and easily understood example for most people), which it sounds like you already know (I'm speaking for the crowd).

To answer your question, I'm really not sure. I think social media is 90%+ toxic and has overall been awful for society, and it's terrible for children. Absolutely awful for their development and self esteem. But that doesn't mean I think that preventing them from accessing social media is correct either. Even if I did, Mississippi's law is a garbage and completely ineffective way to do it and I wouldn't support the law as it stands even if I was dead set that kids shouldn't be on social media at all.

Edit: I didn't answer your question thoroughly. I'm not sure if it's unconstitutional to bar children from participating in social media. As I stated, I think it's harmful in general as it exists today. 2nd amendment is a constitutional right, but we don't allow 12 year olds to purchase guns, so there's plainly lines that we draw with minors. Does restricting access infringe on 1st amendment rights? Sure, but is there enough harm from social media access to minors that it's justifiable to find it constitutional to bar it? I honestly don't even know if there's a credible body of research to say for sure, and my anecdotal opinion totally doesn't matter. We need good evidence and I'm not sure if that exists.

[–] magikmw@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hey thanks for engaging with me.

I think we are aligned with our views on the topic, including the Missisipi solution being generally bad.

Being a dad I am beginning the struggle for well being of a soon-to-be a social media user, and it scares me as hell.

My conviction is to be present, guiding and hoping to teach enough before they stop listening to me.

[–] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, good conversation.

If you like podcasts I really think the Lawfare Podcast (lefties), Advisory Opinions (righties) and Divided Arguments (not sure how they lean, they're more bland, but it's still good, with less frequent releases) are my go-tos for legit, subject-matter expert driven long form legal/court commentary.

TLP has a much wider range than the other two. Their focus is generally in National Security related matters so you'll get stuff about foreign policy, three-letter agencies, what's up with Trump this week, interviews about specific topics, AI, etc.

AO really only talks about current court cases in district courts or supreme court cases. Also have some stuff for advice for legal students periodically, I skip those because I ain't trying to be a dang lawyer, but I just think it's REALLY important to know what's going on in the courts

DA is like, the most boring. But it's great legal review.

Good luck navigating teens on the Internet! Keep hammering home safety, privacy, you can NEVER take back something you post, and that they're only seeing their friend's highlight reels so try not to compare how they feel about their life with what they're seeing on other's posts.