this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
231 points (98.7% liked)

News

31758 readers
2959 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I didn’t mean black/white colorblindness specifically.

I mean in terms of the contrast of the white paint on the road. It works in certain conditions, but it fades and becomes hard to see. Eyesight disabilities come in many forms!

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The white paint used to mark roadways is much more durable than the apparent chalk that is being used in this image... A mild rain will turn the coloring into a mushy color mess that will cover the white markings.

That would be much more detrimental to anyone with eyesight disabilities than anything else.

I would like to reiterate the last paragraph...

The real “risk” here is that new things make drivers turn stupid. If you’ve ever lived in a small city that added some traffic feature after 20 years of not having it… you’ll hear about how people have crashed or broken all sorts of shit for years after. I would be most worried about that… But if that’s not happening, then I don’t see an issue.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah that isn’t chalk. It’s paint.

Don’t mean to sound rude but it feels like you don’t actually want to talk about the problems with crosswalks but just talk about how people are bad drivers.

Appreciate that both of us don’t think the color is a real problem either way though, which is really the point of the article!

That puts things in perspective. Even though we don’t agree on how to get there, we do agree on the goal.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 0 points 20 hours ago

Don’t mean to sound rude but it feels like you don’t actually want to talk about the problems with crosswalks but just talk about how people are bad drivers.

I don't see how you can separate the these items? Crosswalks are there to give safe passage for pedestrians... If a driver plows through a family... and can walk into court and say "I couldn't tell it was a crosswalk because it wasn't properly marked" and get away with it... That's a problem. The point of the crosswalk is to put onus on the driver to drive "Correctly" specifically at those points to make pedestrians safer.

Yeah that isn’t chalk. It’s paint.

Okay... so a little more durable than chalk. but certainly nowhere near as durable as the actual road markings. It will eventually wear weird and probably stain the white crosswalk markings themselves as well...

I dunno... I could be wrong. But I've seen too many times where the person who is clearly in the wrong get away with something that they have no right getting away with just because of some technicality that the letter of the law supports. As long as a person doesn't die because of this I don't care all that much. But the itching feeling is there that someone might.