this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
886 points (96.6% liked)

memes

16959 readers
2525 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Source: TikTok video)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The luggage problem has only got worse and worse over the past decade, and by the airlines' own making. Carriers all started trying to make extra cash by charging for checked luggage, which incentivises people to take carry-on only, up to the maximum size and quantity of carry-on they are permitted.

If bags could be checked for free and people took only an under-seat carry-on for the things they need in flight it wouldn't be a problem, but we know that's never going to happen.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Agreed it’s a combo of higher seat density and way more checked bags.

I swear in the 90s getting off a plane felt way quicker.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is underallocated overhead space. You give us maximum dimensions, and you know the number of seats. Fucking have sufficient overhead space.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The amount of space is the amount of space. You can't create more, because it's literally constrained by the roof of the plane. It's already maxed out.

The only thing they could do to make sure there was "enough space" is to have less tightly packrd seats and carry less people, which again they aren't going to do for the obvious reason - profit.

Or - reduce the max carry on baggage dimensions, which I'm sure people would equally complain about. And would make them look worse against other airlines which "allow" bigger bags, despite there not being enough space to put them!

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If bags could be checked for free

I'm skeptical. I fly quite often and it is normal for gate agents to openly beg people to gate check their bags (for free) and be faced by a crowd of dead eyed travelers unwilling to part with their max size carry on roller luggage.

I wouldn't discount passengers irrationally hanging onto their luggage for some sense of control.