this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
170 points (93.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63717 readers
253 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

sorry for butchering the article title, I've edited my post to try and reflect the intention of article

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is returning it to a lower court overturning a ruling?

This sounds more like as described - "redo it". Overturning would be this court literally "over turning" and saying adblock is piracy.

[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yes. The article only links to it in German but "Werbeblocker IV / Ad Blocker IV" on July 31 was the overturning case.

Axel previously tried twice in 2018 and 2023 and failed. Now that it is overturned, he is going to the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg to get a new ruling.

However I don't speak German or live in Germany, this is my understanding of this article and these court cases.