this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
170 points (93.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63717 readers
253 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

sorry for butchering the article title, I've edited my post to try and reflect the intention of article

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

They didn't rule it, they overturned a previous decision. Not that this isn't bad but it does not mean right now that using ad blockers is illegal. I also think reading other articles on this, that the ruling is also more focused on Adblock plus working with advertisers to allow some ads but block others.

[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

you are correct. I've made the oldest and simplest blunder in changing the title. some times we must all learn the basics in emberassing ways

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

as time goes on I'm considering more and more that this man may be my talpa