this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
444 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

75087 readers
2506 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
444
"I support it only if it's open source" should be a more common viewpoint (vitalik.eth.limo)
submitted 1 month ago by pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

What are your thoughts? Any counter-counter points to the author's response to most concerns regarding open source?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago

I think a new GPL needs to be created to account for this. Like, "any generative system using this as an input which can ever replicate this code base (even in part), must be bound to this license." People could then run overfitting analysis to see if they ever get their copyleft code out of the model. If they do, then they have grounds to sue. I'm fine with an LLM being trained on my code, but I want the four freedoms to be preserved if it is.