this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
1018 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

73850 readers
4355 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Mozilla does it again, adding useless crap.

[–] xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

Make a stable, privacy respecting, robust browser with a powerful extension environment? No let's try do do chrome 2

Mozilla could solve all of it's issuesby just removing all of the executives

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I switched to FF after having enough of Chrome's shenanigans. I don't make changes easily, and I took the sacrifice of not being able to receive calls over Facebook (desktop browser, and some of my acquaintances wouldn't leave FB), and I still preferred Firefox after that.

And now they want to turn it into another Chrome? I could still just use Chrome and have the lost functionality. I mean I won't, but they will just lose users with that direction.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Here I am using browsers like apps. Chrome is my facebook app. I do zero else with it lol.

but really, my solution works fine. Is another 200MB on your SSD really that big of a sacrifice? I have Firefox, Chrome(in a fucking container where it belongs) and Librewolf installed lol.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago

I have sort of the same three browsers on all my machines.

LibreWolf: to use

Firefox: it's the default browser and feels like it should still be installed. And just a couple times a year some website has a strange issue in LibreWolf but will work in Firefox. Honestly I'd rather do it this way than start weakening LibreWolf's settings to make outlier sites work.

Ungoogled Chromium: I'm sure it will come in handy some day.

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Even though I'm aware Google would still have a lot of my data even if I deleted everything possible, one of the main reasons I swapped (apart from the manifest V3 controversy) was the privacy problem (yes, I know, I'm still using Facebook, regardless). I haven't thought of the container aspect, though - thanks for that.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's definitely an issue with the culture among tech companies.

They're all regurgitating each other's shit, so whenever a bad idea gets passed around, they all jump on board.

[–] perishthethought@piefed.social 5 points 16 hours ago

Every ignorant, fearing for their bonus CEO: "If we dont do that, we'll get left behind!"

Feh! Feh I say!

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca -3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

How do you think they will do that without any money?

It's always "just do the browser" , ignoring the fact that everything you listed doesn't matter at all to the general public who are likely using Chrome because it's the default on their device.

Mozilla is trying to find revenue sources but people just complain about it.

The AI integration is clearly attempting to be a new search box.

[–] xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Look at the executives pay of Mozilla, there is a lot of money there to start with.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It isn't though. At the higher end the last ceo was making 7 million. That is roughly 12 enginees after compensation and everything else.. It isn't nothing but it's less than 5 percent of the employees they laid off a year ago.

Increasing executive pay is a problem but it will barely move the needle.

[–] xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago

For what it's worth, I would have no issue payibgif I knew that money didn't go in the pockets of a few executives :)