this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
616 points (99.5% liked)

News

31484 readers
4058 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As Texas Republicans try to muscle a rare mid-decade redistricting bill through the Legislature to help Republicans gain seats in Congress -- at President Donald Trump's request -- residents in Austin, the state capital, could find themselves sharing a district with rural Texans more than 300 miles away.

The proposed map chops up Central Texas' 37th Congressional District, which is currently represented by Democrat Rep. Lloyd Doggett, will be consumed by four neighboring districts, three of which Republicans now hold.

One of those portions of the Austin-area district was drawn to be part of the 11th District that Republican Rep. August Pfluger represents, which stretches into rural Ector County, about 20 miles away from the New Mexico border.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prox@lemmy.world 171 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

This repub regime is really showing us how much our system of government depends on having good-faith actors in (elected) positions of power. There truly are not sufficient checks in place to protect against one election's worth of bad actors.

Kind of amazing that this all worked for about 250 years, and heartbreaking that it could crumble in the next 2.5.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 75 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

worked for about 250 years for a select group of people only

didn't work for the native americans, slaves, poor people, etcetera

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago

Things have improved for those groups over time, notably. We took a shit system and tried to make it represent all of us.

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 32 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Apologies if I misunderstood the american election system, but the fact that for the past 100+ years you've had a bipartisan system in which both parties pander to the wealthy tell me it hasn't really worked. Or rather only worked for the ruling elite.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 14 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

The system has basically always been two-party. It's the only stable arrangement for FPtP voting anyway. So, yes, it has been status quo for 250 years.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 15 points 13 hours ago

2 Fast 2 Postious

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 13 hours ago

Thank you for the correction.

[–] subarctictundra@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Even strong checks can't hold back bad faith actors indefinitely

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

No, it depends on a population that actually cares about democracy and will punish those "bad faith actors" at the polls. Unfortunately, we're dealing with Americans here.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 16 hours ago

Yes if you elect people that agree to the majority of the house, senate, president, state houses, and governors, they tend to get their way.