this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
612 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

73708 readers
3545 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So do a million different forms of encryption. That doesn't make the infrastructure any less centralized. If the people who own the fiber decide to only allow pre-approved types of traffic to cross their networks then it doesn't make any difference what sort of protocols exist. Building free cross-country or subsea fiber routes is not economically viable and the internet doesn't exist without them.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Please look into how i2p works. It’s not just some form of encryption.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Please explain how you can bypass carrier enforced traffic shaping policy.

From geti2p.net:

I2P's protocols are efficient on most platforms, including cell phones, and secure for most threat models. However, there are several areas which require further improvement to meet the needs of those facing powerful state-sponsored adversaries, and to meet the threats of continued cryptographic advances and ever-increasing computing power.

The people involved in the project you're referring to acknowledge that governments can, by influencing carrier policy, disrupt and subvert the project's intended function. Why then are you implying they are incorrect?

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are arguing a different point here than you were above and I’m not going to entertain the misdirect.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Perhaps you misunderstood my point in your haste to make a complicated problem seem simple but no, my argument has not changed.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a very different story than requiring I'd for some websites

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

No it isn't. Either traffic is allowed to flow freely or it isn't. Once you start down the "isn't" path there's not much that can be done to get around the fact that a few people control a huge chunk of the infrastructure.