this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
853 points (97.8% liked)

News

31361 readers
2939 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/aSaAL

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Is there another music streaming service around, so I can leave? I use it damn near everyday and the accessibility is what I crave.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I switched to Tidal a couple years ago and I'm happy enough with it. It's cheaper than the comparable membership tier I was paying for with Spotify. The higher fidelity streaming is nice and supposedly it pays artists the most over any other steaming service. Their recommendation algorithm doesn't index so heavily on your favorite tracks like Spotify's does, so I'm discovering new music a lot more.

The UX isn't quite as smooth as Spotify's. I can't cast from the browser app and it doesn't remember what I'm listening to between devices. When I first switched there were a lot more bugs but I haven't noticed as many over the last year.

After Tidal inevitably succumbs to corporate rot, I'll be switching to owning my own collection and self-hosting. But until then, I'm happy with Tidal.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tidal is owned by Square (the mobile payment app/company), and I think Jack Dorsey (Twitter founder) owns that. So, probably safe to say it's already pretty corporate.

[–] username123@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is just the first article I found

https://fortune.com/2024/10/30/jack-dorsey-layoffs-streaming-music-app-tidal-block-leaked-email/

Honestly I respect the way he called musk on his bluff and forced him to pay 40+ Billion for Twitter, but this article cements him as an asshole in my book. Whenever you see a CEO saying "we need to function like a startup" what they really mean is "I have no fucking clue how to run this business, so I'm going to go back to the one thing that worked for me", not realizing that it was mostly luck not startup culture that cemented their early success.

[–] SupahRevs@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Talking in CEO speak seems pretty mild compared to being on the board of an AI military company. I know there is no perfect billionaire so I'm not going to advocate for Dorsey. But if that is the worse thing about Tidal, I think I'll still support it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago

Yes, but it's a million times better than Spotify, Google, and Apple.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Isnt Tidal responsible for the problems of high quality music formats like .ogg? Making it hard to find and download from them.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Have you tried Qobuz? It's french.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I jumped on Qobuz from a lemmy thread. Really happy with it. The artist selection is pretty broad and the Playlist are decent. But honestly, I haven't disliked anyone from the recommended home page which says a lot. I was on yt music before and it would always loop the same five artists no matter what radio station I started. It was really weird.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Thank you for the rec. I will check it out, looks like theres even a mobile app.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Honestly thata the issue I ran into. Napster and tidal were both in the running for a minute, both were more expensive, tidal is ran by Jay z and Napster is owned by a tech bro. Honestly, I'm more inclined to go back to cd.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Its such a massive PitA to self-host things. Dont get me wrong I love the idea of it, it works in theory, and then you get an update for one of the multiple services you have to run to make it work ex-prem, or your isp does some funky stuff and drops out. There is such a massive time sink into self hosting that its not a reliable answer for 90% of people.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's kinda the opposite of what I have found, once I get something to work it usually just works. Although I'm in IT so I'm pretty used to keeping 'in production' servers going. It absolutely is more work, because you aren't paying somebody else to do it, so you really need to decide if that's worth it to you. For many people the trade off in control and privacy aren't worth the extra work and paying somebody else to use their computers instead is far more convenient.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ive worked in IT before. If things ran as smoothly as you claim, I dont think you would have much of a job. I have had a pi-hole brick itself during an update, routers crash, home PCs just stop working.

You and I have the necessary skills to accomplish what needs to be done, just the basics of reverse proxy or ssh tunnels are damn near magic to most people. Hell, could you imagine walking your tech-illiterate neighbor through the process of it all and then expect them to keep it up without contacting you all time. I can not, which, is one of the reasons why I dont work IT anymore.

For real though, I believe that self-hosting is the only future for most of what are talking about here. I thought it was the most logical next step after everyone had libraries of music and movies at home in the 90s. I had assumed most people would want to keep those and would digitize.

The process to make that happen, and the hardware, are just not accessible to others outside our field. I would like to see a closer to all-in-one-solution become available. A system one could purchase with software ready to go all where you have to do is load it with content. Hell, call it a Spoopify Box or something equally ridiculous and you could VC angel funding in a week in SF.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Be the change you wish to see in the world, I guess. But I don't see a commercial product like that taking off, simply because the MPAA and RIAA will fight it. They will use the media to convince the public that it is a piracy tool. I also don't think it's fair to demand FOSS volunteers to cater to tech illiterates. These projects are a labor of love, not a product. Self hosting means you are taking the responsibility of hosting something, and that comes with pros and cons. I think expecting a black box solution to remain stable and secure in the long run is a hard sell for me, it doesn't line up with my personal and professional experience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bent@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I use a combination of Bandcamp, Qobuz and Jellyfin atm. It gives me the combination of using their apps or my own self hosted. The chances of everything going down at the same time is pretty slim I figured.

I also have all my purchased music stored in a Nextcloud instance so in a pinch I can play the local flac/mp3 files from my computer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yep, I’ve started buying all my media again, even music. Don’t want my copy of a movie to get censored, don’t want my music to get delisted.

The only exception is games. Damn you, steam, for being so awesome in every way except ownership.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gonna cry when gaben kicks it, they go public, and become ea 2.0. Its gonna be hell for gamers.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

All we can do is fight when the time comes. Hopefully his successor has the same values as him.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm absolutely there on movies, even running my own jellyfin, but I listen to such a wide variety that I don't even know where to start getting some of them in physical.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don’t necessarily need to buy physical to own. Most of my music comes from Bandcamp in the form of FLAC and mp3, but I have CDs and vinyl as well.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh heck, I didn't even know about bandcamp

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Bandcamp is where it’s at! If you are ever dissatisfied with the music industry’s proliferation of stupid and samey music, Bandcamp will surely have something for you.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I use a Revanced YouTube Music app that doesn't play any ads, and it functions almost exactly like Spotify.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago

currently i'm doing bandcamp and tidal for my two most least evil options

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you have money? If so, buy music you like from the artists. Bandcamp is pretty good (though they sold out, and might enshittify).

I've been buying music for years and have a big library now

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is there anywhere that guarantees access to purchases forever? Ive purchased music in the past from other providers that went under and lost access to it all.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bandcamp gives you drm free copies of the music. I think you can do flac, mp3, or ogg. They do recommend downloading your copy after buying it because in rare cases something can be removed

I've bought some CDs directly and then ripped the music myself, too.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bandcamp is also cool because you can find some really weird niche artists giving their music away for free.

[–] bent@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago

I have sooo much great weird music I got for free or 50 cents per album.

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aside from actually downloading the audio files and stripping any DRM off them? No one will offer truly perpetual access, because that means maintaining infrastructure forever, which simply isn't going to happen.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Understand the argument of perpetuity but thats certainly not what I would ask for. CDs and physical media have a life expectancy too but at least I can make copies of those.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can always rip cds and records you buy to a nas with a raid setup and an external drive you put in cold storage...media forever then

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yea, Ive got a Jbod sitting around somewhere. Just being pedantic but thats not forever either, there is no physical media that so far will last into infinity. I really thought that was where we would be by now considering how popular VHS, DVD and Vinyl and CDs were.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Forever as in, multiple lifetimes..

Yes, sadly physical media advancements are dead. I always thought it would be fun to see what comes after cd, if the internet hadn't come.

If only we could go back to reel to reels, such a great sounding format that really lasted (have some from 1950 that sound good as new) but the machines take care, and people dont listen to music at home anymore. And making tapes uses a lot of plastic that im not crazy about. But I love them anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tidal pays the highest per play amount to artists, and Apple Music also pays high (second highest for mainstream artists after tidal last I checked), and they have a massive library -but obviously they’re an evil megacorp so use your best judgement.

I personally use Apple Music but then I’m fully ensconced in the Apple ecosystem, so it works for me.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

How is Tidal evil? I've never heard anyone complain about anything but the old mqa standard they have since dropped.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Apple is the one I was calling evil.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I use YouTube music because I all ready pay for premium, but YouTube and Google are getting worse everyday though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)