this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
987 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

73465 readers
3749 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 348 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Just to fast-forward this dumb cat-and-mouse thing, the next step is people go back to torrenting their porn and deeper down the rabbit hole of garbage "free" websites skirting the rules.

As always, the UK is useful on the international stage because sometimes you need to be able to point at some idiot trying dumb stuff to explain to people why dumb stuff is dumb.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 106 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It does feel that way. UK bureaucracy is just one giant guinea pig stunting it's own commonwealth.

Next someone will try enforcing paper umbrellas as a solution for climate action. We'll all say, "That won't work". They'll still do it; it won't work. We'll say, "We told you so", and it won't get reversed because they're already aiming at the next foot to shoot.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago

There has to be a logical next step for the information age. Old school government is not fucking working, and we can all see it.

The fact that there aren't large scale riots already is astounding.

[–] Bubbey@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

UK Bureaucracy is just one giant guinea pig

He tries his best...

collapsed inline media

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 59 points 3 days ago (2 children)

100% Brexit quickly shut up similar movements when people saw how badly it went

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Now if only Trumpism would have shut down extremist right wing idiology globally.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trumpism is still in progress, maybe...

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It should have died when he tried to coup the US government after he lost the 2020 election.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Alberta seems to have missed that memo.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Damn Alberta; always trying to leave the EU.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Then, we move to the socks proxy, or tor, or other options I haven’t even considered yet.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I am pretty sure they would consider tor as using a VPN.

Probably they would demand ISPs to run lists of known VPN addresses and if you connect to them, they will forward the information to the anti-terrorism unit and you will get SWATed.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If Russia, China, and Iran cannot stop tor usage, there's no way the UK can do it.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

I believe China can stop any kind of access at any time, they just choose to allow a certain percentage of folks to get through above a certain bar of sophistication and need.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Don't the people in those countries use a proxy to access tor first? probably that means cycling through the proxies regularly as they become known. I have no doubt that it is impossible to prevent truly tech savvy people from access. Also Russia, Iran and China all run state sanctioned hackers, so the governments have a vested interest in allowing these groups to obscure where they are coming from.

But i am not sure how much that transpires to a broader public.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago

That's what things like snowflake and bridges are for. Because, at least with snowflake, it just looks like a webRTC phone call. But it's actually tor traffic. And snowflake proxies are ephemeral, since you can just run them in your browser and help anyone connect.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I’m uninformed. What’s the reason for the porn ID thing? Is it just porn or more?

[–] lath@piefed.social 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Surveillance due to paranoia due to all the shady shit they're doing.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Neoliberal political class implementing fascist surveillance capitalism laws — masquerading as child protection — because they are owned by a fascist oligarchy.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 28 points 3 days ago

It's never about the children, it's an excuse for surveillance capitalism.

[–] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

Christian evangelists at the root of it all. 'nuff said.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago

Must protect the children

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

You know the old saying... The politicians don't want children to be able to recognize a cunt.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

If data is collected that can be used for blackmail, it will eventially be used for that purpose.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

It's probably true that a few anti-porn people exist somewhere in the world. It's certainly true that fascists love adding in new tools to keep the general population from using the internet freely.

So the answer to your question is yes, and yes.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

Their next strategy will be to keep a list of websites that are “government approved”, I'm afraid. Long live the Great UK Firewall!!

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago