this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
328 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

73512 readers
2982 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Regardless of the actual truth of that information.

[–] Nima@leminal.space 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

indeed. there's the potential for abuse and doxxing. but I think the app could be done in a safe way. and with much less leakery.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 25 points 4 days ago (3 children)

How would you implement the app in its current concept, without the possibility for abuse? It seems inherent to the very idea of it.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

Yeah, the entire point of the app is that you go there and talk about the bad things a person has done.

That seems pretty hard to identify them without posting their image without their consent and discussing private details of their life so others can identify them. It is creepy as hell, at a minimum.

[–] Nima@leminal.space 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

off the top of my head, I don't know. i just feel the concept is intriguing and that the idea is a nice one.

just the abuse potential is far too high I suppose. but it would be nice to know if someone had stalked someone else, may have spoken or behaved in a violent manner, etc.

but I suppose at that point you might as well fingerprint and process any potential suitors lol. 😅

the sentiment is great, however.

Yeah, it's one of those things that would be nice if it weren't for all those pesky malicious parties

[–] Tunawithshoes@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 4 days ago

I am going to say with even the downsides I think the idea is worth it.

My friend sucks to her creeps and maybe she could have saved herself from at least two abused cases.

Maybe like light system based around how often and how a users submits. This person submits a lot of negative responses red light. This person submits rarely green light?

The problem is also how much data do we really want to keep? How little can we keep?

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

Meowmeowbeans social pressure where people will refuse to meet or associate with people who have not been vetted and verified by meowmeowbeans members. So people who want to meet meowmeowbeans users would have to join to get screened otherwise they can get lost.

Solves the issue of people who never signed up to the social media site having strangers uploading personal photos, videos, names, and stories to a profile page they never consented to. Which is reminiscent of doxing in its current state.

So meowmeowbeans certification among consenting members would be the better route to go and socially making those not in meowmeowbeans outcasts. At least there is choice now for people to not be part of the community driven database of people.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So, like the Chinese national merit system? That's super fair and nothing ever goes wrong.