this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
533 points (99.4% liked)

Games

41085 readers
1118 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 336 points 6 days ago (9 children)

We can blame the religious organisation as much as we want, but the fundamental problem here is payment processors. They should be common carriers. Content-neutral middlemen who facilitate payment to anything that isn't literally unlawful. This is no different to an ISP throttling access to Netflix because they operate their own streaming platform. If the storefront, the developer, and the buyer are all ok with a transaction, there's no good reason for a fourth party to stand in the way of that.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 115 points 6 days ago (28 children)

Yeah, payment processing is among the many many many industries that ought to be nationalized so they can be administered in a transparent and democratic manner (see also, healthcare education housing electricity internet etc.)

There's just too much opportunity to use it to manipulate markets and oppress minority viewpoints for it to remain in private hands imo

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Putting the ridicoulous idea that governments are fair and transparent aside, payment processors need to be international. Otherwise, most countries will not be able to access services because their local payment processor is not supported by smaller websites.

However, the payment processors should be regulated with something similar to net neutrality so they can't discriminate payments. And EU could probably launch a government run competitor to dilute their duopoly.

[–] Bubbey@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Really the only time they should be even allowed to discriminate on payment is when it is suspected to be part of a crime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

To me it's insane that food also isn't on that list. Anything that isn't a luxury can't be trusted to be handled by capitalism.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So you want Trump and MAGA politicians to be able to deny your payments instead?

The problem with "just let the government do it" is when the government is run by people like this.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

So don't let them.

Basically nothing works if no one cares about their community. One of the reasons Trump is in power right now is because of a deep seated American apathy for, like... everything.

Trump, et. al., are dismantling USPS, but I like USPS. It's bad that they're doing that.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (5 children)

How naive can you be? You think your vote matters here?

When every single district has been gerrymandered to death for 100 years, nobody's vote really matters anymore.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Your cynicism can't defeat me, man. I am God's holy warrior. I crush weak pessimism like yours beneath the weight of my iron will.

How is it you think private companies will be more easily coercible when Trump's cronies are the private sector?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Power finds a way, so I wouldn't hope for nationalization itself to be anything good.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Maybe the idea of BTC was fine. What wasn't fine is the idea of mining.

And maybe payments over the Internet or over PSTN are fundamentally different from messaging, conferencing, downloading files, all that stuff.

But what's important is the ability to pay for a service with something resembling cash IRL in the sense that an ATM machine from which you took that cash can't take it back because you are paying for an adult journal with it.

But at the same time how can there be so few payment processors that they can affect a platform's decision to do a kind of business?

That's where we should look. Why is it hard to be a payment processor.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Payment processing should be treated like a utility.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That "treated like a utility" approach involves reliance upon the state, which is sometimes controlled by the hostile parties. This is what I don't like in Internet political discussions, such solutions feel as if they assumed that you make it good once and it remains good.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It doesn't necessarily mean it needs to be ran by the state.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago
[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago

Maybe the idea of BTC was fine. What wasn't fine is the idea of mining.

The mining is how BTC, etc are decentralised & secure (so the idea of btc and mining are the same idea in my head).

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago (3 children)

That’s where we should look. Why is it hard to be a payment processor.

Because you essentially need a global presence to at all be worth using. That is why it is a joke that NOBODY accepts American Express and only the shadiest of international ATMs accept Discover (saved my ass in Germany back in the 10s though)

You are literally saying that we need to look at why there aren't more global mega corporations.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

GNU Taler is supposed to be a solution. Sort of a federated one. If I understand it correctly.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I am not particularly familiar with that but it will have an uphill battle. Replacing online transactions is a challenge but is feasible. And while I will always clown on cryptocurrency, I do wish at least one had actually taken off to fulfill that role without focusing on To Da Moon scamming.

Getting to the point that you can pay for food on holiday is a much less feasible one for a purely software project run without the backing of Special Interests.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm going to be really dumb

Why does a payment processor need to exist?

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I am an artist in OtherCountry. You want to buy art from me. How do you do it?

Physical money? Okay. You now need a way to track that YOU sent 40 bucks in the mail and that I received 40 bucks in the mail and that is (at least) two different national postal services involved. And now I need a way to convert 40 YourLandia dollars into OtherCountry pounds. AND we need to make sure all of that happened quickly enough that exchange rates didn't meaningfully change

Digital money? Who is running the site? How many different sites do I need to have accounts on to accept payment from all the countries I want to sell to?

At the end of the day: For any transaction that is not face to face transfer of hard currency (and even then but...), you need an intermediary that both parties trust. Payment processors are that intermediary. Sometimes they are the person taking my IOU and turning it into money so that you can give me a hamburger. Sometimes that is effectively a courier making sure your money gets to me no matter where on the planet we are.

It is what lets us have transactions that aren't "Okay, you drop your armor and I'll drop my money and then we'll slowly change places and... who the fuck just ran out of the bushes to steal the money I put down while waiting for you to put down your armor? And why are you now both doing the Carlton?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jadedwench@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

As a daily AMEX user, I think I have only run into 1 place that doesn't take it here in the states. I do remember England being hit or miss at times, but that was over a decade ago. I don't remember it being much of an issue in Germany either, but I didn't use AMEX as often at that time.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 1 points 5 days ago

Mining is fine when you have a predetermined and adjustable energy consumption that is halved every 4 years. Which Bitcoin does

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

No grasshopper, the blame falls squarely on the former. The latter was fine with things before

But we DO need to solve the payment processor issue as well, ever heard of GNU-Taler ??

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 6 days ago (12 children)

The regressive asked the payment processors to do this. The payment processors themselves are the ones that actually did it. The regressive barely had any actual leverage. The payment processors chose to cave.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago

The reason for a "fourth party" is because so many of these are fully international.

The dream of cryptocurrency as actual currency (rather than just reinventing stocks) was the idea that you could use your bitcoin wallet to pay for a pizza in Kansas, London, other London, Shanghai, or Timbuktu with no perceived difference. That IS what visa/mastercard provide.

Get rid of that "fourth party" and now every single online service needs to have office space in every single country so that they can accept and convert purchases on their own. And the end result will just be dropping the majority of the world.

load more comments (5 replies)