this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
726 points (92.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

41130 readers
1099 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wrong, the state owns the land but you can own the house, and not just for your 70y BS period.

There are plenty of articles like of instances where homeowners don't want to sell for infrastructure like this: https://twistedsifter.com/2012/11/china-builds-highway-around-house/

I know for a fact here in EU or the US they will indeed " just tells you to gtfo"

BTW, in China a high 90% of people OWN their house and aren't rentslaves.
So there's that China bad man.

[โ€“] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's hard to overstate how much safer and more ethical it is to use eminent domain and fairly compensate someone monetarily for their property than to leave their house in the middle of a highway

[โ€“] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's besides the point wether you think it's better or not, it should be the OWNER's decision as is the case in China.
And not what this rustydomino is pulling out of his ass.

[โ€“] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No it's not besides the point, it's in direct response to your point. Leaving a house in the middle of the highway is a better outcome for no one

[โ€“] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The discussion was about having rights of ownership and on the decision, not anyone's opinion what is better.
So you're completely besides the point even if you can't admit this obvious fact.

[โ€“] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm sure the developers offered "fair compensation", you need to demand lot before fucking up the highway design is more economical than meeting their offer.

[โ€“] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In the US, the government provides compensation, not developers, and they pay fair market value as determined by local appraisal districts.

[โ€“] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

The main difference here seems to be that the US can compell property owners to accept what they determine is a fair market rate, but another poster informed me that in some cases the chinese can compell people to sell too.