Lemmy's design is focused on quality content by ditching the Karma farmers and addicts. No more chasing upvotes—people here actually focus on real value instead of feeding the ego.

EDIT: I know there are upvotes and downvotes, but the problem with Reddit is you can't post in most communities if your karma or reputation is bad. This is a big problem because herd mentality prevails there and if ypu have unpopular opinions you're basically censored.

Lemmy isn't designed to milk ypur dopamine with notifications every 10 upvotes, so you focus more on posting valuable cont instead of farming for approval and upvotes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the point is the consistency. It's quite easy to prompt the model to just respond in always in the same way, and one could just say "you are supposed to talk like an average redditor. Keep it positive and short, and only elaborate if asked to."

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

By that point you may as well be an LLM. ChatGPT is pretty good at emulating writing styles.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

My reddit account (with the same username) is 19 years old. This one was created in June of 2023, from even before the blackout. OP's account is 17 days old.
If you really care about it, I can arrange ways to prove that I am a real person - just get my matrix id here, and we could chat there if you want. Do you think that OP would accept such a request?
Are you forgetting that some weeks ago there was some idiot around here telling how he wanted to get some LLM bots to post content and figure out if others would notice? Oh, and it's not that it was a fully automated bot. The idea was to just post the content, but on accounts where he was supervising and could write as well.

I stand by my opinion. OP's playing y'all for fools and now we are all arguing pointlessly.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

that's just ageism gatekeeping /hj
Assuming you mean video chat: I think it's very reasonable for someone to turn down a PII (personally-identifiable information) reveal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_199#c-Dilettante-20241204211400-EEng-20241204232600

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 17 hours ago

Let's flip this a little bit: if someone offered you a bet that OP is a bot vs not a bot, how much would the odds have to be in order for you to take it?