rglullis

joined 2 years ago
[–] rglullis@communick.news 20 points 1 day ago

The point you are trying to get is exactly where Wordpress and Ghost are going.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, the frustrating thing is that https://activitypods.org/ already does the hard part, but we need more developers interested in creating these clients that can work well with it.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 week ago

You only heard the term in context of centralized big social media so you think the term has bad connotation

Please, don't assume things about the people on the other side of a debate. It's condescending and it robs us all of learning.

I'm not saying that we don't need platforms because of "bad connotation". I'm saying it because I have worked on a "social browser" for the fediverse, an application server for using activitypub as a transport mechanism and I know that we can develop an open social web that does not rely on server-centric applications.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, far from me saying that the clients (apps?) need to look the same. What I am saying is that the differentiation should be happening at the client, not the server.

It's the thing with Communick. I wish I didn't have to offer separate instances for each of the services (Mastodon, Lemmy, Funkwhale) but that every member could get one account which then could use as their main fediverse actor, regardless of "frontend" suited them best. The shell should adapt to the user, instead of the user being forced to adapt to the application.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We don’t need all fediverse platforms to be a Mastodon clone

We don't need platforms.

[–] rglullis@communick.news -1 points 1 week ago

We are going to build this as an opt-in feature

I think that the the problem is that it's opt-in, when it should be the default.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 week ago (8 children)

What’s thr point of making pixelfed just another mastodon type app.

The problem is the Fediverse could be a lot more than just "decentralized versions of existing apps". Most people now have this app-centric mentality because it was beneficial for Big Tech sharecropping, not because it was better for us.

We shouldn't need different types of apps to see different types of feeds and to sort our data in ways that we want.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 0 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know if it's good or bad, but it seems that most people forgot about https://alien.top/ and https://fediverser.io/

[–] rglullis@communick.news 18 points 1 month ago

Take a look at https://communick.com/lemmy, I don't have an automated way to import an existing instance but if you have a backup of your media and database we can work something out.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 25 points 1 month ago

Meanwhile, Google/Alphabet is announcing today record revenues of U$ 100 billion for the latest quarter alone...

The less the community support smaller, independent service providers, the more we will all be assimilated by the Borg.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 2 months ago

There are a lot of architecture astronauts that will keep talking about "we should develop a grand-unifying system", but most of them are all talk and little result.

When push comes to shove, the developers that actually ship are the ones that look at problem they want to solve and work on that.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes, it is possible.

Whether enough people want it is a different story, and most developers are stuck in the app store mentality, so it gets difficult to get enough support for this to move faster.

 

Please, tell me how "paying for hardware costs is enough"...

 

cross-posted from: https://communick.news/post/2494298

If you are not aware, sportbots is a project that mirrors Twitter accounts from popular sport reporters, players and the leagues themselves. These bots are presented as regular ActivityPub actors, which means that they can be followed from Mastodon and any other AP service that is oriented towards microblogging.

With my work on Fediverser and the ActivityPub Toolkit, I'm realizing that we could do something similar for Lemmy. The Fediverser system could keep a database of these bots accounts and then map them to the relevant Lemmy instances/communities.

I'd like to get some opinions on how best to do this. Here are some of my ideas, in order of preference:

  1. Reach out to the developer behind sportbots.xyz and ask them to add this integration directly, to make sure that the bots post not just to Mastodon-like systems, but to groups as well.

Pros: it can be very straightforward. No new bots being created on the Fediverse. Cons: the code seems to be closed, so we have to rely on the dev to implement this.

  1. Add the functionality to Fediverser to map mastodon/twitter/bluesky accounts to Lemmy mirror bots, and also map these accounts to the specific communities where they should be posting.

Pros: Accounts could be eventually be used by the real owner. Open source. Cons: More bots in the Fediverse (not at alien.top scale, though). Not that many Lemmy admins seem interested in deploying Fediverser so far.

  1. Create a separate project from Fediverser that does what sportbots is doing, but focused on Lemmy.

Pros: most flexible. Could be easier for other people to run it if interested. I would be sure to open source it. Cons: It's yet-another project that I would be taking on, and I don't have any more bandwidth for new projects unless they are guaranteed to bring some revenue.

Please, let's avoid any "who cares about sports?" or "I only want organic content here" type of discussion. We need content here if we want to get more people to stay active and if you don't care about sports or the bots, just feel free to block them.

view more: next ›