this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
595 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

72524 readers
3748 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

For those holding out for a hero: https://ladybird.org/

Ladybird is a brand-new browser & web engine. Driven by a web standards first approach, Ladybird aims to render the modern web with good performance, stability and security.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not looking for a hero, I'm looking for stability.

[–] hanke@feddit.nu 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The fact that it's aiming to be stable doesn't mean it is. It's still a work in progress unlike other browsers.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Currently, it's pretty shit. It starts up in fullscreen with a non managed window, well, fuck that noise.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

well that’s because it’s kinda not trying to be a browser first; it’s trying to be an engine… let others make the UI, and ladybird can be the best damn thing to wrap that UI around… from what i understand, they have a web browser as more of a tech demo right now

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but I still don't know why they seem to think it's so important to write a new browser engine instead of improving Gecko or Servo. To me it just seems like people like it because they don't know other things aside from the Chrome, Safari, and Firefox browser engines exist and just chase something new and shiny.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

that’s fair, but i think there’s space for multiple to compete… servo and ladybird have different ethos from what i can tell.. ladybird is trying to build everything from scratch, as well as being completely independent (whilst servo was mozilla and is now the linux foundation)

personally, i prefer servo just because its rust and i don't think that independence from the linux foundation is really that important

but that’s not to say that what ladybird is trying to achieve, or their reasons are wrong

[–] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 4 points 7 hours ago

Why the downvotes??

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Why not just run a community build of Firefox, like IceCat?

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If Firefox doesn't keep up with web standards, neither will any of the forks

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 13 minutes ago

Cold take: we need to stop chasing web Standards that are purposefully set up by big corpo to be exlusionary.

What we need, what Firefox could hope to be, is a browser developed for a new old internet paradigm. Maybe Gopher, or Gemini (the good one). Alternatively a purposefully reduced HTML+CSS, no JS.

Trim down the fat so that it is actually possible to finance the development of a web engine an browser without leeching on a dick corpo (and sabotagong open internet in the process).

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 17 minutes ago

Question. Does it have uBO or an equivalent yet?

Without it, it'll simply not be internet-ready.