this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
698 points (96.3% liked)

Piracy: ๊œฑแด€ษชสŸ แด›สœแด‡ สœษชษขสœ ๊œฑแด‡แด€๊œฑ

62574 readers
1130 users here now

โš“ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules โ€ข Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

๐Ÿ“œ c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


๐Ÿ’ฐ Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] FaceDeer@fedia.io 10 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Now make the exact same meme but substitute "AI training" for "piracy" and watch the downvotes flow in.

[โ€“] Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well yeah, because my objections to AI aren't based on copyright law.

[โ€“] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 2 points 13 hours ago

In Canada it's very hard to get into trouble for piracy unless you make a profit from your piracy.

Or well...until these LLM showed up. That's the part I take issue with.

[โ€“] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 7 points 21 hours ago

tbf I did do this a week ago and nobody downdooted me https://lemmy.uhhoh.com/comment/11886692

[โ€“] Nelots@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago

This is an interesting argument. I don't think the two are completely analogous, and the whole thing falls apart once you go beyond consumer level usage due to piracy's inability to make new things like AI can. While piracy isn't going to get any game developers or musicians fired, AI image gen very likely will. The more it improves, the harder it will be for companies to continue justifying paying real artists.

That said, you do make a good point that many pro-piracy arguments can be used all the same to be pro-AI image gen. At least at the individual consumer level.

Because AI isn't creating a copy of the original thing, it is attempted to replace the original thing for a profit. It would be like if a publishing company took some book, removed random parts of it then replaced them to parts from other books, then sold that instead of paying authors to write books.

[โ€“] deaf_fish@midwest.social 2 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, cause generally humans downloading things is good and AI downloading things is bad.