this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
36 points (97.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

35696 readers
868 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not like 1912, but say 1979 instead of 2003 for a gen z. Now, if you would retain the knowledge you have now or not, thats up to the genie.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

While this idea has good intentions, the "privileged savior" is a toxic one. It assumes that your help would be accepted, appreciated, and necessary to "do things right". It also assumes that you wouldn't fall in line with the majority for your own safety, which I am willing to bet is more likely than not given the measures taken against those who supported those movements.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This is very true the idea would not be the savor but just a pair of hands to help. Also in this scenario remember I know the future so i could have a greater impact but just having that information. You also have to remember there were some white people that were icons in the civil rights movement. It was not about one race clawing it's way up against another race. It was people of both races coming together against inequality and bigotry. If an ally is turned away just because they are white then it's just a race war and the ownership class win.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This is very true the idea would not be the savor but just a pair of hands to help. Also in this scenario remember I know the future so i could have a greater impact but just having that information.

What can you do that would benefit a movement in the 1960's?

What information do you have that could change any of the outcomes, how would that information change the outcome specifically, and why do you believe changing history wouldn't negatively impact the progress of those movements?

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Saving 4 innocent girls from a church fire would be a start. The rest I will take my cues from quantum leap and just try my best to do right with once went wrong.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So, should they NOT be an ally for the marginalized?

Sure, there will always be toxic people virtue signaling for attention, but it's not any less toxic to shame someone when they are legitimately trying to help.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So, should they NOT be an ally for the marginalized?

Show me where I said this.

Sure, there will always be toxic people virtue signaling for attention, but it’s not any less toxic to shame someone when they are legitimately trying to help.

This is about a very specific example, i.e. going back in time to "do it right this time", and I can assert with a high degree of certainty that any random "privileged" person leaving our current time would not be up to the task of helping those causes.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Realistically, yes, I don't think one more person would make a huge difference and change the world any sooner. But calling someone toxic for wanting to try does not feel helpful for anyone.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

But calling someone toxic for wanting to try does not feel helpful for anyone.

Show me where I called someone toxic.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

While this idea has good intentions, the "privileged savior" is a toxic one.

And I'm done with this. Have a great day.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 17 hours ago

Notice how I said "idea" and not "person".

No need to act offended over your misunderstanding. Check your emotions before engaging people in the future.

Take care.