this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
-4 points (41.7% liked)
Political Memes
8739 readers
3287 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Currently Syria is being Israel's little bitch (for example they allowed them to use their airspace for the initial attack) so I'm not sure this meme is accurate.
Wow I wonder why Syria would allow one of their enemies to attack another of their enemies
The new, ISIS/fundamentalist linked, regime doesn't seem to be the enemy of Israel. They've specifically stopped the clandestine supply of goods and arms to the Palestinians. Allowed Israel to carry strikes inside Syria against their internal enemies.
You do realize that ISIS was one of their primary foes, right?
By that do you mean the Iranian supply of goods and arms?
Golly gee, I wonder why they wouldn't want the country which supported Assad's regime with a supply of troops and direct Iranian assistance in genocidal massacres continuing to operate in the country?
Must be a mystery - or a love of Israel!
'Allowed'
You mean like Assad 'allowed' it? Or have you forgotten Israel's numerous incursions into Syria during the past decade and a half?
Syria is not, and has not been for a long time, in a position to resist Israeli attacks. Not really sure what you expect the current freshly minted government to respond with.
And, Christ, accusing Israel's 'support' of Alawite communities as being against the Syrian government's enemies?
You mean the strangely recognized new state is rolling over and showing their belly to capitol?
Of course they are. They bought recognition from Trump, months after a revolution. Of course they're not taking stands, they've gotten legitimacy despite their very tenuous status. Not to mention, they've taken a hard stand against Russia... They kind of have to play ball
And what I've heard they've been very reasonable to the citizens and trying to make this a smooth transition. I don't blame them for doing what they have to do... It would be really, really stupid not to
Pretty sure the thousands of people who have been killed by regime aligned death squads in the last few months disagree. But whatever.
Well if that's the case I'd obviously change my opinion
Got some sauce for me?
https://www.reuters.com/investigations/syrian-forces-massacred-1500-alawites-chain-command-led-damascus-2025-06-30/
What OP said is patently false as demonstrated by this in depth investigation by Reuters.
After going through all these links, I'm inclined to agree. I think I was correct initially...
The rest of this feels like bullshit to me. .
The strongest period of the civil war has ended (probably), but there's still ongoing Assadist insurgencies, and the control of the state over the innumerable militias and paramilitaries, which it did not control before the Assad regime fell, is far from solid. Back in May, for example, Assadist paramilitaries committed a massacre of Sunni Muslims, and shortly thereafter, local paramilitaries committed a counter-massacre of Alawites. The central government has formally condemned this, but its power to restrict this ongoing violence remains limited - and, in all truth, it's probably less interested in restricting massacres in pro-Assad areas than in anti-Assad areas.
I don't know how to respond to this but to say I'm anti-assad? This feels pretty clear cut
It's muddy insofar as the government's responsibility for, control over, and actual effort put forward to restrain sectarian reprise-killings is in question. Officially, they've come out strongly against it, and realistically, they probably have little control.
However, some believe, not without reason, that they aren't particularly interested in restraining the reprise-killings, either out of the belief that it will suppress Assadist insurgents, or out of spite against Alawite communities which supported Assad.
The Reuters investigation proved this to be patently false. They organized those death squads.
From your own link:
But I understand that reading your own links is a bit too much effort for you to put in. Why bother with that when you have a narrative to peddle?
Maybe read more than a quarter of the article. But I understand it's a bit much effort for someone like you.
Aw, someone's mad that it was pointed out that their own source disproves their point.
It's funny you think I'm mad, I'm just disappointed there are people like you around here.
Try to work on your reading comprehension and maybe in a couple years you can read through the whole article again.
People with basic reading comprehension?
Yes, I suppose that must be deeply disappointing for people who want to peddle thought-free narratives.