this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
1330 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

71866 readers
4775 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw the Tesla Robotaxi:

  • Drive into oncoming traffic, getting honked at in the process.
  • Signal a turn and then go straight at a stop sign with turn signal on.
  • Park in a fire lane to drop off the passenger.

And that was in a single 22 minute ride. Not great performance at all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That's almost like a "three strikes" rule for drunk drivers.

Oh man, that would be amazing. If after 3 strikes, all drunk driving could be eliminated... If only we could be so lucky.

He's not talking about a per-vehicle points system, he's talking about a global points system for Tesla inc. If after a few incidents, essentially Tesla FSD had it's license revoked across the whole fleet, I mean, that's pretty strict accountability I'd say. That's definitely not handing out free passes, it's more like you get a few warnings and a chance to fix issues before the entire program is ended nation wide.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, if they weren't as buggy as they clearly already are, then sure... do a point system.

But as they stand, they shouldn't be on the road.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't understand the complaint. I mean given their track record, with a system like this, they wouldn't be on the road.

You know, unless it all worked.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I mean given their track record

That's my point. Tesla (the company) has been notorious for pushing forward their deadly "self-driving" technology. It's one of the worst automated systems on the planet, with plenty of tests, reports, and real-world incidences to raise red flags all over the place.

They SHOULD NOT be on the road, so are they only on the road because Musk was able to influence someone?

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You seem really invested in making sure Teslas are off the road, but not at all interested in regulation that would keep all dangerous autonomous vehicles off the road. So... do you work for BMW, or Waymo?

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago

Tesla vehicles are specifically singled out, because as far as I know, they are the only autonomous vehicle that uses cameras instead of Lidar.

And the Tesla company has a habit of cover ups, falsifying or manipulating crash data, and fraud.

I don't trust any autonomous car on public roads, but some are considerably more trustworthy than Teslas.

FWIW, you can buy robot vacuums for your home with more advanced object detection than a robotaxi. 🫤