this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
907 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

66353 readers
4321 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Manufacturers are slowly starting to listen to what car journalists and owners have been complaining about for almost a decade: Cramming all the car’s functions into a touchscreen is an inferior solution to having dedicated physical controls for key tasks.

Among the manufacturers known to be switching back to buttons is Volkswagen, whose latest vehicles have gone touch-control-crazy with functions either buried inside a touchscreen menu or relocated to an annoying haptic feedback panel.

We’ve known for a while that Volkswagen was considering putting back some buttons in its cars, but the manufacturer never officially acknowledged this. Now VW’s design boss, Andreas Mindt, has admitted to Autocar that this approach was a mistake and that the automaker is backtracking on this trend.

“From the ID.2all onwards, we will have physical buttons for the five most important functions—the volume, the heating on each side of the car, the fans and the hazard light—below the screen,” Mindt told Autocar. He added, “They will be in every car that we make from now on. We will never, ever make this mistake anymore. On the steering wheel, we will have physical buttons. No guessing anymore. There's feedback, it's real, and people love this. Honestly, it's a car. It's not a phone.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The thing the vast majority doesn't care about and that doesn't prevent them from buying cars and that you'll have to live with unless you just keep driving your old car forever?

[–] regrub@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'll eventually have to buy a new car, yes. But I'll also be looking into replacing the car's cellular antenna with a dummy load if possible. A good car shouldn't depend on cellular networks to be able to function.

[–] mac@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately, a lot of them are bad https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/categories/cars/

I'm looking for reading on cars that don't break when you disable the cellular antenna, but haven't found much so far.

Even if you disable the antenna, who is to say it doesn't cache telemetry locally that isn't just sucked up by the dealer the next time you bring your car in?

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But then how will you know where the nearest Arby's is on your commute

[–] satans_methpipe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

My favorite place to buy and use drugs!