this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
1199 points (98.6% liked)

memes

15556 readers
2869 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imaginary numbers are not "more accurate", they don't invalidate any previous understanding. They are an imaginary concept with interesting properties. For mathematics, that's enough.

No. Imaginary numbers have the worst name. Like the Schrodinger's Cat thought experiment it was something meant to mock the concept originally but stuck once real applications were found. Imaginary and complex numbers describe very real processes in nature and are not just some weird artifact of trying to get the square root of a negative number.

Here is an interesting video on the topic that also covers some of the applications used to describe things in nature. https://youtu.be/cUzklzVXJwo

If you prefer text here is an article listing some. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/maths/applications-of-imaginary-numbers-in-real-life/

[โ€“] bampop@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Imaginary numbers have the worst name.

I agree, because really all numbers are imaginary. Numbers are also wonderfully useful for describing nature, and it's amazing how what might start as a quest for completeness and elegance ends up reflecting something about the real world. Each extension on our use of numbers is an augmentation, an extended toolkit to solve different problems, but doesn't negate anything which went earlier. For example finding the roots of a polynomial often represents a problem where complex solutions aren't applicable, and "no solution" is the more meaningful result. One kind of mathematics may be bigger and more complete than another, but that doesn't make it better or more true. It just depends on what you need from it.