Canada

Canada is in advanced talks with the European Union to join the bloc’s new project to expand its military industry, a move that would allow Canada to be part of building European fighter jets and other military equipment at its own industrial facilities.

The budding defense cooperation between Canada and the European Union, which is racing to shore up its industry to lower reliance on the United States, would boost Canada’s military manufacturers and offer the country a new market at a time when its relationship with the United States has become frayed.

Shaken by a crisis in the two nations’ longstanding alliance since President Trump’s election, Canada has started moving closer to Europe. The military industry collaboration with the European Union highlights how traditional U.S. allies are deepening their ties without U.S. participation to insulate themselves from Mr. Trump’s unpredictable moves.

MBFC
Archive

I am asking myself if the Canadian population knows what that means to them. At irregular intervals, the EU is given more powers in order to have more power. There is currently a debate about whether the 27 armies should be converted into a European army. This would also affect you if you are part of the EU. In many areas, Canada would lose its powers and passing them on to the EU. This can be seen very clearly in financial policy. You would have to adopt the Euro as your currency and the European Central Bank would make interest rate policy. Of course there are more positive things, but you have to understand and accept that you would lose some of your independence.

Ladies and gentlemen, the dumbest person on the planet, Donald Trump.

Archived

Original article (requires registration)

Canada has floated doing major defense deals with Europe and improving the continent’s access to its critical minerals in response to President Donald Trump’s threats and his pullback from US defense commitments.

Canada is seeking closer defense industry cooperation with Italy and the European Union as “a matter of urgency,” Elissa Golberg, its ambassador in Rome, wrote to Italy’s finance, foreign affairs, defense and enterprise ministers.

[...]

The ambassador’s letter, which was seen by Bloomberg News, requested Italy’s support in ensuring that legislative texts allow third parties to collaborate with the EU’s ReArm defense plan.

[...]

Golberg’s letter outlined plans “to purchase a number of key capabilities through major near-term procurement efforts” including as many as a dozen submarines, additional fighter jets, and battle tanks “that could potentially be acquired from European suppliers”.

[...]

Canadian industry “has much more to offer,” the letter continues, like drones, satellite communications, robotics, AI, cybersecurity, and better integration of supply chains for Canada’s large reserves of critical minerals needed for advanced defence technologies and renewable energy systems such as nickel, cobalt and lithium.

Europe’s effort to boost defense spending “is of interest to us as Canada because of a potential alternative supplier,” Carney told reporters in London on Monday. “It creates the potential to create supply chains that mean that Canadian companies are participating in the development of these defense systems.”

[...]

Trump continually says the war in Ukraine is horrible, soldiers and civilians are dying everyday and he hates to see suffering and dying over there.

Well, has he thought what would happen if the USA tried to annex Canada? There would be people dying, there would be soldiers AND civilians killed, it would be just as bad, if not worse than Ukraine.

Canadians will FIGHT for our country. We will kill and die for our country if we have to, just like any other country defending an attack on their sovereignty.

Why hasn’t any reporters even asked him this question??

https://www.thehandbasket.co/p/trump-fentanyl-weapon-of-mass-destruction-executive-order-draft-scoop

Well this is absolutely frightening in so much that Trump is going to force his way into Canada via military operations by claiming fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction.

Anyone remember the Bush Administration and WMDs they said were there but never were?

Elbows up Canuck’s. The time to prepare is most likely closer than we think.

How news deprived is your city?

The last 16 years have not been kind to local news outlets in Canada. This report creates a new dataset which tracks the 2,900 local news outlets in Canada whether radio, TV and print (whether newspaper or online). It tracks changes in those outlets back to 2008, down to the postal code level. It is used to determine net losses in media coverage in Canada and where they have occurred.

Devastation of the local print news industry: Since 2008, we’ve seen a net loss of 11 per cent of print media outlets (whether newspapers or online). This has meant the closure of roughly 25 print media outlets a year since 2014 but with the devastating net loss of 83 outlets in 2023 due to the Metroland bankruptcy and Métro Média closures in Quebec.

Private broadcasting is faring little better, but not by much: Private broadcasting local news outlets, whether TV or radio, have fared little better, with the net closure of nine per cent of local broadcast news outlets since 2008. The worst year on record was 2024, with the net loss of 14.5 private broadcasting outlets, driven by the decrease in CTV outlets and decreases in service and closure of several Corus stations.

2.5 million Canadians have almost no local news: The net result of these changes is that 2.5 million Canadians now live in a postal code with only one or no local news outlets. This accounts for seven per cent of Canadians, up from three per cent a decade and a half ago. However, the more common situation for most Canadians is that they have some local news coverage but are in a state of constant news deprivation.

All provinces/territories except Ontario saw declines in small town news: Smaller towns, those with less than 30,000 people, have seen one in 10 news outlets close in the past decade and a half. In all provinces and territories except Ontario, we’re seeing net losses of local news in towns with less than 100,000 people. Smaller communities in Newfoundland and Labrador, Quebec, P.E.I., and Manitoba have seen the worst of it.

Newfoundland and Labrador seen cataclysmic losses of local print outlets: Outside of St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador lost three quarters of their news sources in the past 16 years. These smaller communities and rural areas often had only a single local outlet, generally a newspaper. However, many of these papers have closed shop, leading to a 100 per cent decline in print outlets for those small towns.

News Deprivation Index in Canada’s 45 big cities and capitals: For the 45 cities with more than 140,000 people and all capital cities, we’ve created a news deprivation index to see if local news is keeping up to population growth. Here are the findings, at a glance:

• Three in five cities had a net loss of local news outlets while 11 per cent haven’t seen a change and 27 per cent of had a net gain.
• Broadly, the cities with the least news deprivation are regional hubs that produce broadcast content for the remainder of their province or territory. These include Yellowknife and Whitehorse, Saint John, N.B., St. John’s, NL, Charlottetown, P.E.I., where news content is re-aired on radio and TV repeater stations throughout those provinces and territories. Many of these have a strong public broadcasting presence.
• Broadly, the cities with the most news deprivation are the suburbs of larger centres: the suburbs in the Greater Toronto Area, Grand Montréal and Metro Vancouver populations have grown quickly but local news hasn’t kept pace or has declined. This is as true for public broadcasting as it is for private outlets.
• The Toronto suburb of Vaughan has seen the largest loss of local outlets. It houses a third of a million people yet has only one print outlet. It lost one of its two local papers in 2013 and saw a decrease in service at the other, the Vaughan Citizen, in 2023.
• Gatineau, Quebec, saw decreases in service or outright closure of many of its local print outlets.
• Edmonton lost a third of its local news outlets, spanning decreases in both public and private broadcasting as well as the outright closure of numerous print outlets in the city.
• Vaughan, Langley and Surrey experienced among the largest losses of local outlets and, partially as a result, they also have among the worst local news deprivation.
• Brampton, North Vancouver and Mississauga have made proportionally large gains in the number of local news outlets. Brampton had an average of two local news sources in 2008 and is up to four in 2024. Mississauga went from three outlets to four. But each house three quarters of a million people and the additional outlets aren’t nearly enough to cover the increase in population.
• On a rare bright side, Kelowna has gained news outlets and has a relatively low news deprivation.

Bottom line: The rate of local news deprivation across Canada is snowballing. This analysis demonstrates that the ad-funded local news model that has been dominant in Canada for more than a century is no longer viable. Despite efforts by the federal government to provide financial and regulatory supports for this model, the sector’s demise is accelerating.

New models of local journalism are necessary for a new century. One way to address this is through the expansion of public media, such as the CBC and/or community broadcasting. The federal government could also improve support for local print journalism, which has borne the brunt of media losses. One thing is certain: nature abhors a vacuum. If responsible local news coverage is lacking, social media will quickly fill the gap—often with misinformation.

Authors:

• Karen Foster | Associate Professor, Sociology and Social Anthropology and Canada Research Chair in Sustainable Rural Futures for Atlantic Canada, Dalhousie University

• Alicia Martin | Postdoctoral Fellow, Common Ground Canada Network, Dalhousie University

• Gavin Fridell | Professor of Political Science and Global Development Studies, Saint Mary’s University

• Kathleen Kevany | Professor, Sustainable Food Systems, Dalhousie University

Rising tensions between Canada and the United States have made increased military investment and a renewed focus on national defence all but inevitable.

A recent Angus Reid poll found three in four Canadians want to see the country’s military strengthened in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s threats to annex Canada as the 51st state. In early March, former prime minister Justin Trudeau committed publicly to increasing military spending.

While it makes sense for a country feeling vulnerable to invasion to look at recruiting new soldiers and increasing its arsenal, there is an additional facet of national defence that is too often overlooked: food preparedness.

Trump’s on-again, off-again tariffs are already “stoking a new nationalism” in Canadians and sparking interest in buying local, but food should be part of the national defence conversation, too.

Yukon-born, BC resident Jasmine Mooney describes the horrifying experience.

Egg interceptions up 116% so far this year, while seizures of fentanyl down 32%

Salut, fellow Canadians! I moved to Korea many years ago, and up until recently, I had done any international shopping via Amazon.

I'm looking for a few things and am in need of help:

1. I need a shipping service that is Canadian owned that I can use to forward parcels to Korea, effectively replacing Amazon's shipping.

2. I'm in search of Canadian made bedding.

3. I worked in George Richards/Grafton many moons ago, so I know they're probably my best bet for big and tall clothes, but am looking to see if anything else has become an option since I left.

4. Shoes... I'm a 16EEE sized shoe... I don't even know where to begin to find replacements for my boats-for-feet coverings. I've even tried local cobblers here in Korea with no success.

Any ideas?

Egg interceptions up 116% so far this year, while seizures of fentanyl down 32%

The energy executives called for a simplification of regulation and a commitment to firm deadlines for project approvals.

They also want an elimination of the federal government's cap on emissions, the repeal of the federal carbon levy on large emitters and loan guarantees to help Indigenous co-investment opportunities.

It took just one meeting with Lutnick to reverse his strong stance and start saying:

Mr. Ford insisted Mr. Lutnick somehow wants to “boost up” Canada, despite Mr. Trump’s repeated threats of annexation and tariffs that could cripple Canada’s U.S.-trade-dependent economy.

...

“They aren’t coming into our country to take over, I’ll tell you that,” Mr. Ford said. “I kind of flip this around. What a compliment. We’ll never be a 51st state. Canada’s not for sale. But isn’t it nice that someone thinks we have the greatest country world, and they want access?”

...

The Premier’s comments follow last week’s high-stakes trade drama, in which he backed down from imposing a 25-per-cent surcharge on his province’s electricity exports to the U.S. Mr. Ford’s move prompted a vehement reaction from Mr. Trump, who immediately threatened to double the 25-per-cent duties he was about to impose on Canadian steel and aluminum.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-trump-tariffs-doug-ford-response/

VANCOUVER, British Columbia -- Tesla has been removed from participating in this week’s Vancouver International Auto Show over safety concerns, the event’s executive director said Tuesday.

Eric Nicholl said in a statement that the show asked the electric carmaker to withdraw because of a “primary concern” for the safety of workers, attendees and exhibitors.

Nicholl said Tesla was provided “multiple opportunities to voluntarily withdraw.”

“This decision will ensure all attendees can be solely focused on enjoying the many positive elements of the event,” the statement said.