zbyte64

joined 2 years ago
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 3 months ago

One of the stair ways leading to the cell is obscured, we can't rule out that entry way. Also the video doesn't rule out that other inmates on the block could have done the deed.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 3 months ago

Because Mamdani is famous for not answering questions about his policy proposals. /s I refuse to believe Mayo Pete is that dumb.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Does Japan / type-A not have grounded circuits?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 3 months ago

Because individualizing violence won't change the system. When we set up our own courts and then use a 12 gauge to enforce, we're putting the elites on notice that there is a new sheriff in town.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Before that we need to create our own court system to pass judgement on these pedophiles.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 28 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Be the change you want to see

Gandhi

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 34 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If we just uncapped social security contributions this wouldn't be an issue. This is a manufactured crisis to convince people that socialism doesn't work and we should go back to barbarism.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The only reason SS wouldn't pay out is if you don't qualify or it is repealed (or they break the operations so it doesn't work). It will be there when you retire at a reduced rate. If we uncapped the SS contributions the that problem goes away.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I was all for Social Security when I knew one day I’d be able to partake in it too, but with everything going on, fuck that and give me my money back.

Mission accomplished. SS is one of the most successful government programs and we can't have that!

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Hukuo in modern China could be perceived as prioritizing the right to have a home over choosing to have none. "At what cost" includes homelessness and higher unemployment rates. We are quick to highlight where there is a lack of right in China but not how it reflects on our own lack of rights. That is to say, they aren't trading their rights for economic progress, which is how the west often frames progress (our foreign sweat shops are good actually because it helps them in the long run). They are trading one set of rights for another.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 3 months ago

You hold your teenage daughter like this? 🧐

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 3 months ago

Wow, it's like it gets worse with every bit of context.

view more: ‹ prev next ›