Not understanding the logic doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
We created math and devised a method to ensure that equations can be solved in a way that leads everybody to the same result. If you don't use the rule, you don't get the same answer as someone who does. In this circumstance, yes, you do teach by nailing down a strict rule as it's foundational to the language (math) that we've created.
Alright, enjoy demonizing your allies because your views are so binary. You're just as much of a hindrance to the leftist movement as the people you complain about.
I'm not sure how to simplify it further for you. It's not the fault of the Democrats, but they're partially responsible. It's entirely fair to call them out for doing it again.
If someone comes to your door and says "let me in I'm going to rob you", and you say "no" but don't close the door, lock the door, or do anything to stop them (similar to the performative opposition we see from the Democrats) do you bare no responsibility for the outcome? Sure, you're not the robber, but you were warned and didn't do anything.
You seem to think criticism of the Democrats = someone saying they're Fascists just like the Republicans. Sure, that idea is out there, but now you're just painting everybody with that brush. You and MAGA seem to share more similarities than you think.
Man. Every day, I see less and less difference between the fat left and MAGA.
Probably need to get your lenses checked, because how you took that comment speaks a lot to how you see things and it sounds like you need a new prescription. This is a post about Democrats caving to the GOP once again, so the comment fits the context.
Are they wrong in stating that the cowardice and unwillingness of Democrats to put up a real fight for the average person paved the way for not one but two Trump presidencies? Trump is a symptom.
A sub has more than the single purpose you mentioned. You can't just hand-wave away their most critical role: intelligence gathering.
If it was about spending as much money as possible we wouldn't be buying from South Korea as they manufacture vessels faster, and cheaper, than other countries. If we built these at home they'd probably cost 5x as much, we'd get them 10 years late, and they'd be riddled with issues.
I'm trying to see your point. Do you want us to increase our shipbuilding capacity to build these in Canada, or do you not want subs at all?
Do you want the government to give all of this money to our local shipbuilding industry so that they can continue to gouge taxpayers? They can't even provide our military with the equipment they won bids for without inflating costs and timelines by an exorbitant amount, and that's not even for subs which are significantly more complicated than something like a supply or patrol ship. At least Davies shipyard was able to provide the CAF with a supply ship within reason, but others, like Irving, are a giant money pit.
Welcome to the internet, I hope you have a good time here. Nobody is obligated to understand others' situations, especially with no prior interaction with you, and you don't get to gatekeep content you post openly online or control how it's shared.
If you're being banned by mods who don't take the time to check timestamps to verify you're posting OC, that sucks, but who cares if you're banned from an instance or platform that's moderated by someone who's "too blind in the brain to see the truth."? Is the fact that your meme is being shared by others and enjoyed not enough of a dopamine hit? Do you really need to be able to spread them yourself through platforms/instances that are moderated so poorly? If you're that concerned about it, you can always add some sort of watermark. That's an easy way to link it back to you. There's no point in trying to police the actions of strangers on the internet, you stand no chance.
Ah, so they're just rolling out viable models now, so we should build infrastructure based on something that's just starting to be viable in that one specific location? Nah.
I'm not sure you know what moving the goal posts means.
Not even Japan is mass adopting hydrogen vehicle infrastructure, why would we? How many hydrogen cars are on the road?
Mass transit? Yes 100%. Hydrogen vehicle infrastructure? No. Not at a mass scale, or not on the near future, anyway.
How many hydrogen cars are on the road in Canada? A few hundred, maybe a few thousand? We're not going to build infrastructure around a concept when even the heaviest adopters of that concept aren't fully behind it.
Hey I don't have cats so it might be a bit different, but I've had a few dogs over the years and I figure it would be similar. Your cats probably associate the carriers with going to the vet which it sounds like they're not a fan of. Their thought process is probably carrier = vet = no thank you.
Have you tried to put them into the carrier without actually taking them to the vet? Drop some treats in there, let them explore it at their own pace, close it for a minute or two, and then either reward or praise them after release? Keep progressing to the point that treats are no longer required to lure them and they enter on their own, but still reward them on release. Rinse and repeat (and repeat and repeat and repeat). Over time they may change their attitude towards the carrier their mindset may turn into carrier = treats and praise.
If they're not food motivated you may have to use alternate bait such as toys or nip.
It's certainly possible and even likely that there were people marching who just didn't give a fuck or were purposefully marching like shit, but as somebody who's served and marched plenty, you'd be surprised how quickly things get messy. It's easy, sure, but it can get out of hand quickly.
If one person goes out of step, especially with no cadence cues, those behind follow the one who's fucking up either consciously or subconsciously. Then the one who's leading the out of step march shuffles to get back in sync, forcing everybody behind them to have scramble to shuffle back into step. It's a domino effect.
Like I said, I won't say it's not possible that you're right, but if you were to watch any marching group you'd see people out of step in almost every case. Regardless of if they wanted to sabotage Trump's parade in this case, most of the people I served with wouldn't want to intentionally make their unit look like a bag of hammers - which sloppy marching does.
I think a lot of people are over analyzing this but like I said, it's still possible that what you believe is true.
I would pay a premium ticket price to get a lay down seat at the back of the plane and have no food service in that zone. That gets rid of the food sales loss, for which I have never paid for anyway, as I'd be paying a higher ticket price. I guess at that point there is still a concern regarding a mess, since I can bring my own snacks, but it's not like I would be getting some memory foam mattress with Egyptian cotton sheets with the way airlines would implement this anyway. I'd get a long ~~pleather~~ vinyl cushion with maybe a standard pillow.
It would be worse than what I got in the Navy, slightly, but still better than any shit airplane seat I've sat in.
The article mentions that the weather was affecting flights home for workers, not affecting the ability to vote. In this case, there's no need to delay the vote. The workers could've kept working and should've been offered accommodations due to a delayed flight home.
Waiting for the storm to pass would've included polling stations opening, remaining opening until voting closed, and accommodating workers who wouldn't have been able to leave on a plane as scheduled. Denying Canadians the ability to vote on election day so that the workers could ensure they made it home as scheduled to not be inconvenienced is unacceptable.
Edit: I was partially wrong, accessing locations was part of the article: "In several cases, it was not possible to recruit local teams. In other cases, harsh weather conditions have prevented access to communities."
If somebody needs to pay for their insulin with a credit card, chances are they're already not very well off.
So, start with a baseline mediocre life due to financial constraints. Oh wait, you're also diabetic. So let's drop that quality of life further. Now you're $800 in debt, plus interest. Chances are you're not paying the balance off next month, and if you're not paying off the balance then you're probably using credit to pay for your next batch. Now you're in a cycle of paying off your debt, similar to payday loans. Your "disposable" income is now shrinking each month. You sacrifice meals, and you don't do anything enjoyable because most things cost money, but you need your medicine to live. Eventually you end up so deep in the hole that you either have to sell what you have (i.e your home, if you even own one), or claim bankruptcy - which as a low income earner will limit your potential to pick yourself up even further. But wait! You still need to buy your insulin, and now nobody will lend to you. Now you've lost the value you've built throughout your life AND the debt keeps piling up.
Death sure sounds like an enticing option now. What's the point of living if it's in misery? You very well may rather be homeless for the rest of your life (while still being diabetic but not being able to afford your medicine), but I'd rather die.