ysjet

Please go find a sense of humor, and stop punishing people for imagined slights with biohazards.

The fuck is wrong with you.

I mean, from all accounts and evidence, they have been, just not consensual blowjobs from people of-age.

The big deal was that Republicans finally had some legitimate ammo on a Democrat. That's it, that's the whole thing. They milked it for all it was worth.

If he had admitted to the blowjob, they would have attacked him for that. Since he didn't, they pretended it was all about the lying.

It was really just about having a convenient excuse.

I'm poking holes in his argument heehee!

These are real fucking people. Get some empathy.

He didn't do 'exactly what I said I wanted him to do,' don't put words in my mouth and lay off the insults.

As for 'prove it,' what proof would you accept without degenerating to more namecalling and flagrant ignorance of current events? The fact that the only senators claiming Schumer did a good job and is 'solid with the caucus' are the 8 Democrats that flipped? Levin and McMorrow outright stating they no longer support Schumer as senate minority leader due to his actions? House Democrats like Jefferies and Khanna also stating that he didn't fight and needs replaced? Wahls stating that the Democrats who voted were given his blessing, and motherfucking Jeanne Shaheen herself- one of the very democrats that voted to capitulate- directly confirmed on Fox News Schumer was involved the whole time.

Spice Hoarder asked why you were getting downvoted, not why you were negative, and I answered that question. Also, for the record, when I did answer that question, you WERE in the negative. And judging by this reply, you should have stayed there.

It's because Schumer worked to get this to happen, then bowed out at the end so he could pretend he had nothing to do with it. He was the architect and the driving force behind this capitulation.

So people are downvoting MiddleAgesModem for falling for a blatantly obvious attempt by Schumer to redirect blame.

Sure. First one that came up for me was https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5584077-democrats-snap-funding-shutdown-concerns/ I can't find the original article the person linked when I saw it, the politics channel of that discord is... uh, lets go with 'busy' lol

Most Americans say country is on the wrong track, blame Trump for inflation, disapprove of the president and say he is going too far to expand power of presidency

Democrats: "Oh shit, this is actually working, quick, find 8 fall guys to let the budget pass!"

(yes, that is really happening- 8 democrats have broken with the party and said they would be willing to vote for it.)

I'ts not supposed to make sense, it's supposed to convince people not to vote, because people exercising their rights are inconvenient to the republican leadership and their backers.

The only thing the tolerant cannot tolerate is intolerance.

He can demand all he wants, the federal government doesn't get to decide how elections work.

My understanding is that window's passkey support differs from something like what is offered by linux distros in that, instead of storing your passwords in a strongly encrypted, audited, and trustworthy store like 1pw or similar, windows instead stores them in the OS.

Which personally I consider a con, I don't trust windows to store pictures without fucking it up, why on earth would I give them passkeys?