yoevli

joined 2 years ago
[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Assuming you're playing games through Proton rather than vanilla Wine, kernels before 6.14 already have fsync which is used by Proton and effectively does the same thing as ntsync.

[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That's just called arguing in good faith.

[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That's a good point; I had overlooked that as a category. That said, it is sort of the odd one out in terms of "immutable traits" (notwithstanding Jews specifically, at least when referring to ethnicity rather than religion).

[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Generally speaking, hate crimes are only applicable to crimes motivated by a hatred for an immutable trait. Social or political ideology isn't immutable, so it wouldn't be protected.

[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Um... no? Literally the first removed comment is for using a slur, a good chunk of them are blatant spam, and while others are maybe borderline for personal attacks I definitely wouldn't call the mods who removed them "power-tripping".

[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Middle English is certainly difficult to understand, but most words still bear some resemblance to modern English. I think it would probably be more like a native German speaker trying to understand a heavy Bavarian dialect, or at worst a Dutch speaker trying to understand the same.

[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Gateway is a special case since it connects two systems and on Wayland it uses the scaling of the "server" system rather than the host. This is a pretty unique class of issue, at least in my experience. To be honest, I'm not even sure if it works correctly on X11.

[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I honestly haven't had that experience at all with Framework, at least on Plasma Wayland. All of the apps I use play very nice with scaling (with the exception of apps through JetBrains Gateway, but that's a different can of worms).

[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

So I will gloss over, see if it's addressed to me, of not I will probably wait until it becomes my problem to react/reply

Tbh I would rather have someone do this not realizing I'm expecting a reply from them than to reply only to some of it, because when the latter happens it's usually like pulling teeth to get a response to the rest.

[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, what region are you in? I live in a city of ~80,000 in the northeastish US and I'm not even sure it's possible to be more than 5 or 10 minutes from a grocery store here.

[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That's assuming the key and message are entirely independent. If you or the recipient isthe type of person or doing the types of things that would attract surveillance from a nation state (because realistically that's the one of the only scenarios where non-esoteric privacy practices might not cut it), it's not unrealistic that they'd intercept both your digital and physical mail and would be able to correlate them. At least with public key encryption, the private key is never actually in transit.

[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

This is how all modern cryptography works. A deterministic cipher is functionally no different from pig Latin when it comes to actual security. An electronic solution like public key cryptography is infinitely more secure. If you're especially paranoid you can generate the cryptotext locally and send it by email; that would be much safer than anything you could achieve by hand.

view more: next ›