ubergeek

joined 3 months ago
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

Kicked dog hollers.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)

More specifically, it's capitalism that is the problem, not tech.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I refuse to debate ideas on how to make ethical CSAM with you.

Go find a pedo to figure out how you want to try to make CSAM, and you can well akshully all tou want.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

yeah but like, legally, is this even a valid argument?

Personally, legal is only what the law allows the wealthy to do, and provides punishments for the working class.

Morally, that's what you're doing when you use AI to generate CSAM. Its the same idea why we ban all pre-created CSAM, as well, because you are victimizing the person every single time.

i dont see how this is even relevant, unless the person in question is a minor, a victim, or becoming a victim,

It makes them a victim.

But i don’t know of any laws that prevent you from doing that, unless it’s explicitly to do with something like blackmail, extortion, or harassment.

The law exists to protect the ruling class while not binding them, and to bind the working class without protecting them.

Does a facial structure recognition model use the likeness of other people?

Yes.

Even though it can detect any person that meets the requirements established by its training data? There is no suitable method to begin to breakdown at what point that persons likeness begins, and at what point it ends. it’s simply an impossible task.

Exactly. So, without consent, it shouldn't be used. Periodt.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

Netanyahu scammed. Dunno about getting scammed.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

No, the problem is a lack of consent of the person being used.

And now, being used to generate depictions of rape and CSAM.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today -1 points 1 week ago

With this logic, any output of any pic gen AI is abuse

Yes?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (7 children)

i have no problem with ai porn assuming it’s not based on any real identities

With any model in use, currently, that is impossible to meet. All models are trained on real images.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That said, sexuality and attraction are complicated.

There's nothing particularly complicated about it not being ok to rape kids, or to distribute depictions of kids being raped.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I believe, in the US it is protected by the first amendment.

CSAM, artificial or not, is illegal in the United States.

https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/man-arrested-producing-distributing-and-possessing-ai-generated-images-minors-engaged

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today -3 points 1 week ago

Queer and trans friends of mine were also laughing their asses off at this video....

And yes, calling out Trump as being the "beta cuck" to Elon DOES cause discomfort for a narcissist like Melania's husband.

And it's the sort of thing to push, to cause fractures in the white house.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Probably a lot like Gemini web. No, not the AI bauble.

view more: ‹ prev next ›