Because the only imaginable positive outcome is appeasing everyone of course.
How about trying to minimize harm to as many people as possible?
Because the only imaginable positive outcome is appeasing everyone of course.
How about trying to minimize harm to as many people as possible?
That is nowhere near the border. If your kid rather bleeds out than facing you because they got some blood on the carpet you're far in abusive territory
Before the rise of liberal democracies there where no billionaires though. If they never had existed the world might look different now.
We actually have Indian numerals, we just call them Arabic because those are the people we copied them from. That was more than a millennium ago though, so how is it relevant to OP's question?
Well, most of the world is actually under authoritarian regimes and not liberal democracies.
Not the parts where 90% of the research and development for our current information technology was done.
You're just assuming this is anti-male, without any context it might as well be a complaint about lack of sex education.
Even then, rich parents can pay for better education and tend to have better connections. Doing it that way would mostly just fuel nepotism in companies and encourage people to find loopholes to pass on most of their wealth before they die.
Lemmy has been nothing but news about this guy for the last week.
The nice thing about Lemmy is that that depends on what you subscribe to.
Correct. But depending on your job and spending habits it may also be possible there.
They will not be replaced because good luck trying to write code on a phone or tablet.
With Linux phones coming up I can see that happening with a docking station to connect your phone to a monitor and keyboard.
Is that a feature of an app you use? If yours, which app? I don't see it in the web interface.