techt

Does this mean any "both" situation is actually an either-or, because the choice is still between both or nothing? I don't like that

Marry a lady!

Also, pedantry: activate! It's not an either-or situation -- it's a both situation.

On continue.

Once you get to the second semicolon in the same sentence, I'm calling it journalistic malpractice.

8 commas

2 em dashes

2 semicolons

1 sentence

I don't think that's what milquetoast means, but maybe I missed the sarcasm (sorry). Saying no ethical consumption exists under capitalism isn't really making any kind of point in response to that -- just trying to understand here, but are you saying that for that reason, all consumption is equally ethical? That might be more interesting to talk about, and less thought-terminating. I hope your kid is doing well; I know how restrictive that diet can be.

My prediction is they'll train an LLM on all his speeches and put before the supreme court that it can be president because it executes his will.

Gattacum

Thanks for taking the time to explain :)

If the ACAB post is just words, then no. If it's imagery of people being beaten by cops, then yes. There's no need to argue extremes to make the point seem ridiculous -- just use judgment and be kind.

It's about being considerate; that's where the conversation starts and ends, so don't get sidetracked or focus on semantics. It does not matter why someone is browsing any website at their place of work, so let's not even bring that into the conversation. NFSW is meant to help people view content at work/in public by making it avoidable. It's a communication from the author/community to the audience that the content may or may not be inappropriate -- that's it. If it's debatable and isn't tagged, that's inconsiderate and a request to tag it should be treated with consideration and kindness (barring trolls, which OP clearly isn't).

But that's just my opinion, and I acknowledge yours is different.

Just because there's no nudity doesn't mean it's safe-for-work. This would absolutely make my female colleagues uncomfortable and that falls under the spirit of NSFW. Getting pedantic about what is or isn't pornographic or nudity to justify having gross pictures up on your screen is entirely beside the point -- if there's any reason it could contribute to a less equitable workplace, it should be labeled NSFW. If there's any debate about it at all, it's the considerate thing to do.

...drunk?

Which one are you using?