technocrit

joined 1 year ago
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People still use microsoft? smh.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Here's what is not free: Fuck zionism.

You might lose your job, be kicked out of school, be deported, kidnapped, tortured, genocided, ethnically cleansed, etc... I'm afraid to even say it semi-anonymous on the internet.

The people who enable fascism are not going to stop it.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The ACLU believes money is speech and corporations are people. They're just capitalist/nationalist wackos.

https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/why-aclu-wrong-about-citizens-united/

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The ACLU are nationalist ideologues who don't believe in anything. There's no objective definition of "civil rights" or even "free speech". They promote the wacky idea that money is speech and corporations are people. They're only "free speech absolutists" for the rich or whatever the system tells them. They're fash enablers.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's never been any actual free speech. There was never free speech for slaves, etc. We're literally barred for saying the state should be overthrown which is probably the most important thing that anybody could say. Legally money is speech and corporations are people. Regular people can say whatever but capital has a nonstop bullhorn into our homes, tvs, radios...

It's a completely meaningless concept.

organizing and mobilizing under a racist ideology that promises to eliminate free speech should be criminalized.

Who's the fascist now, huh??!!!!? \s

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They didnt care sbout free speech until they stepped over a line

What line? Calling for genocide or calling for its end? Because only the former is actually bad and only the later is actually attacked.

Free speech absolutism enables fascism. So does "both sidesing" fascism.

It's called the paradox of tolerance. There's a cartoon about it because it's kinda 101. Like something that most children understand.

collapsed inline media

view more: ‹ prev next ›