shinigamiookamiryuu
You say "for the admins" like this is meant as a smear. I noticed groups that risk being overshadowed by a lack of direction and wished to step in as it might help. Is there something wrong with that?
I'm quite sure a number of us have been banned from at least a number of communities, often based on informed as well as uninformed or faulty judgment, as well as been labelled as banned when the individual isn't banned, all of these at play depending on the aspect. I'd be surprised to see someone in charge of any given place who hasn't been given the boot at least somewhere. You have been mentioned to be banned from a number of places, though I wouldn't bring these up and don't know why others would.
If one were to look at the logs, I'd challenge them to ask the banners for proof of what was listed as the ban in each case as a kind of mental exercise. A ban is not a perfect indicator of anything, and I'm told this is just the nature of the fediverse. I'm just here offering myself to different people as an aid.
I win the lottery and buy the country of Pitcairn Island. That would be my perfect Sunday.
My perfect normal Sunday is where, after church, I have the day off, can interact with people as I please, and I don't have artist block.
I can fulfill that role.
That's some really good cosplaying you're performing there.
I won't lie, some of your work I'd give five stars.
The opposite extreme is also true and something I have faced, where people can even be mistaken between one another because people forget that no mindset is at 0%. It's not like DNA where nature makes sure we all have a unique said (heck handwriting and signatures aren't even like DNA, which has always been a bombshell whenever I bring it up), and there is no hard rule about how often two people coincidentally operate the same way, something that has made its way into the world of scientists.
What do you mean?
Only in the same way Jake from State Farm is.
Alice like the band?