shinigamiookamiryuu

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 3 points 44 minutes ago

No. Neither one would change how universally relevant basic ethics are.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 0 points 17 hours ago

Put whoopie cushions in the door.

I have no doubt it can be done. I've seen something along these lines for myself. Many people have begun their life with destructive ideas only to realize what was wrong and shake that off themselves, which one might say is natural as the seekers of insight we are. I'd be lying to say this didn't describe me in a few ways, having thought in a more generalized, unthinking way in the past. Given enough time, it's hard to imagine that not all of us would become Uncle Iroh.

We are given a glimpse of this in history; we see the likes of Hirohito going from warlike to a pacifist, General Butt Naked converting from a genocidal warlord to a preacher, Dr. Seuss once being Japanophobic before making amends, the great Confucius himself becoming who he was after being disillusioned with his position of power, and if you are of my religious group, God himself.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

It depends on the kind of individual we are talking about and the circumstances behind them. So many different things potentially spring to mind when I hear the word "asshole" that it's impossible to generalize. In most conflicts I've observed, both sides are referred to as assholes in some way, which means, either way, you're going to be accused of defending an asshole. Sometimes you are even surrounded by assholes.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago

This was actually a huge problem in medieval times. The people back then adhered to the existence of the death penalty, but they also didn't see it as anything aside from a kind of state sanctioned murder rather than how you'd expect many people to see execution. Executioners were thus highly stigmatized, to the point where we have that stereotype today of medieval executioners having that black veil over their heads to conceal their identity, and out of necessity, the role of executioner was inherited like that of a monarch rather than acquired, since often nobody would've otherwise sought the job. Executioners were considered so much of an outcast and felt so little incentive to be executioners that it was medieval law that they would get a lifetime supply of free food in order to reduce the burden of the job. They were considered a hesitant necessary "evil" that put a cap on other "evils", like adultery (oh the horror). Or so they say.

Times have evolved though, and I go by a different school of thought (schools of thought where it's much more difficult to get to the bad place and stay there if your intentions are good). I cannot help you out of legal issues should something happen, but I have faith that doing what you consider to be a favor won't be eternally punished.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

There is honesty, but there's also putting too much faith in the whole tough love thing. That's all I'm saying.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

I'm sure it does or doesn't depending on the situation. There's no blanket answer to this, but I know it's not without its effects. I've noticed a lot of people who are considered attractive who get more tolerant treatment by others, all while some get worse treatment because the envious channel their disappointment on them. Often I wonder which one I am given the kinds of people (who are male-majority in some cases) don't like me.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

To be fair, it's never that simple.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It helps to be a tad more productive/casual in one's responses to things like this, not give someone the Foghorn Leghorn treatment and expect it to be the final word.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Both? So the best way to put it is I identify with my hometown and my state, identify less with my nation without totally "not" identifying with it, and identify most strongly with the land I came from before then.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm not a mom at the time of saying this. The closest I get to being one is being a childrearing aid to a pair of twins. They are young, innocent, and without those political passions yet (I don't blame them), so I'm guessing Musk comes off as a passing circumstance to them, but at one point that one diplomatic meeting was airing and they asked if "that strange guy" (Elon Musk) was breaking the rules because he wasn't "wearing his school uniform" (i.e. he wasn't wearing a suit like everyone else). Probably the only thing they understood of it all, but it speaks a bit about what is starting to develop.

 

The Roman dodecahedron is an item that has turned up in a lot of sites where people do archaeology. While most items, given time, have their purpose easily or at least approximately deduced by researchers, the Roman dodecahedron's purpose is largely baffling to even the most studied of archaeologists, who have no idea on where to start with it. This in turn would probably baffle the Romans, who would have seen it as a common household item, no different from a spoon or a comb.

Suppose a few thousand years from now, archaeologists were excavating our remains and had varying degrees of success deducing what different things were for. If you had to guess what common household item of ours would stump them the most, what item would you guess it would be?

 

The Roman dodecahedron is an item that has turned up in a lot of sites where people do archaeology. While most items, given time, have their purpose easily or at least approximately deduced by researchers, the Roman dodecahedron's purpose is largely baffling to even the most studied of archaeologists, who have no idea on where to start with it. This in turn would probably baffle the Romans, who would have seen it as a common household item, no different from a spoon or a comb.

Suppose a few thousand years from now, archaeologists were excavating our remains and had varying degrees of success deducing what different things were for. If you had to guess what common household item of ours would stump them the most, what item would you guess it would be?

 

That statement isn't some random thing to grab one's attention, it's something I've seen come to light lately. Those who have been keeping tabs on me will know who I am talking about. Everyone is in a positive frenzy over it. Guess who even helped buy the uni supplies and garb (cuz things like uniforms aren't just for high school) for them?

What's a time when you learned that someone you know is more connected to another person you know (perhaps you yourself) than you would've originally thought?

 

I hear a lot of people say "I don't use toilet paper, I use [insert alternative here]" but never hear about what is used for the other things.

 

Referring to any moment in life where someone accidentally found themselves in an issue due to their identity mistakenly being marked as "obvious".

 

Love her or hate her (and my opinions are mixed), I must confess, JK Rowling was a huge influence on why I didn't become a regular author. No shade on people who get what they paid for, but the young reader crowd is just so gimmicky, and not in a good way, and you see that with a lot of works like Percy Jackson and Twilight (but also predominantly with Rowling's work). How do you compete in such a no-rules game?

So then let's talk about one of the cores of the issue. People often have an epiphany when divulging into Harry Potter, and they think "huh, what's the deal with this if that thing is how it is". While noting that conflicts in literary analysis don't always reflect something that doesn't add up and that it could be a hiccup in details/semantics, the questions themselves don't go away. And there's nothing that matches the amount of those having to do with Harry Potter. What example of which strikes you as the most overlooked?

If Rowling herself ever notices that I'm bringing this up, let it be known I do think of her work as a reskinned Brothers Grimm in the universe of The Worst Witch and that I'm collaborating with another author (Samantha Rinne) whose work I would argue deserves Rowling's prestige if Rowling's work deserves it. Thanks (and here is where I run for the hills).

 

I was watching Neighborhood Wars, which is a program in a "list format" that documents interpersonal stuff that happens in different communities. It seems in every episode there's at least one thing about the community coming together for some cause, such as everyone coming together to defend an immigrant whose lemonade stand got attacked, or everyone coming together to investigate whether a boy actually committed a certain act of assault that he was accused of (haven't a number of us been in that situation). Think back to the original Spiderman movie when the citizens of New York City started throwing stuff at the Green Goblin and saying "you mess with Spidey, you mess with New York!"

While this was on, a Québécois acquaintance that was visiting my home for some casual time lamented "hélas, cela n'arriverait jamais ici" (roughly "if only that happened here"), probably unaware that the community once drove someone out of town who was trying to incite sentiment and came by to give me a hard time personally (someone I am known here as having talked both about and toward before; their clique was last seen giving a "final awareness message" about me). All despite the fact the only reason I myself barely escape having a "weird flatlander" reputation to this very exclusive community is due to my home once belonging to my grandfather, not helped by being a French Polynesian descendant.

Does your hometown community have any moments like this?

view more: next ›